Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List　Showing 5,086 to 5,100 of 7,624

Low grade and limited to hand deployment, and this high risk and passive effect will not be useful. If you want to develop it, there are many other good cards, and if you can meet this condition, the return is much greater when using Barrier Force.

A card whose name can be mistaken because of a certain senior.
There are many battle support and expansion cards for beasts, and there are cards that go well with it, such as Huai and Airlock.
However, even though it is premised on battle destruction, it is said that Trap is slow.
It's necessary to send it to GY, so it's somewhat dependent on the opponent, and the firepower multiplier is not enough for the conditions, is it?
It is undeniable that there is something unsatisfactory in spite of the various demands.
As expected from the name, it is a card that can be used for story rather than practical use.
I would like to pull the trigger with Pyuman and Beast Eyes.

It's a card with an easy-to-understand name, and the effect is faithful compared to attack blocking.
However, the performance side is no longer a substitute for use. Changing the battle position, which consumes one card that can only be used on your own turn, is not worth it, and the inflation of the environment has drastically reduced the number of defense cards issued in the first place.
The battle position change card itself has become difficult with the appearance of Link, and it will be impossible to adopt it unless it is locally incorporated into the kingdom rule.

It's an easy-to-understand name card, but it can't stop the attack itself. In terms of performance, the card is already unreasonable.
There are cards that can be used in a wider range, such as Enekon and Book of the Moon, and changing the battle position by consuming one card that can only be used during your turn is not worth it.
The battle position change card itself has become tougher with the appearance of Link, so it won't be a substitute for use unless you have some kind of passion.

A more reliable guardian than a castle wall. However, in terms of performance, it is an environment where it is meaningless to strengthen the basic defense, and there are many more excellent cards such as 《Stronghold Guardian》, so it is an existence that you can not rely on.

A castle wall that gives the impression of being fragile, as it could be broken even by a rushing wild boar, not to mention a guardian. Are the people and boars of this world just non-standard?
Strengthening the defense compared to ATK is less meaningful in this era where we can't afford to put up walls with the exception of Aztec and his Superheavy Samurai, and there are a huge number of better strengthening cards. there is It's practically useless.

An unreliable reinforcement that even loses to a wild boar's charge. Even this was an excellent card when it first appeared.
It's an enhancement card that doesn't have a quick attack, and with this enhancement value, it won't be useful anymore.

It has the same deployment ability as 《Linkslayer》of the same attribute and race, but compared to that, it requires more Cybers in your hand, so it's heavier.
On the other hand, the status is moderately weakened overall, and as a main Cybers, it has high combat power. It will be a combat support, and it will play an active role as a combat personnel when receiving an EX meta.
However, this weight is still a bottleneck, and if you don't secure it early in the Cybers, which consumes a lot of money, it will be difficult to deploy. Due to the deployment conditions, compatibility with Cordic is subtle. I feel that this high level is also difficult to make use of in his current Cybers.
Due to its cost, it is a card that can play an active part in the early stages. I think it's a card that has a strong habit and is suitable for combos.

It doesn't matter if it's a basic resurrection target, but it's fatally incompatible with this card whose activation trigger is Trap. There is a lag, and you have to straddle the basic opponent's turn, and you will be exposed to the threat of removal.
No matter how effective Cybernet Search is, there are many other cards that should be prioritized in Cybers, which develops at high speed. I think it's a tough performance card.

It's a universal collection, and the concept is interesting, but the big bottleneck is that it's slow and highly uncertain. The recovery effect itself isn't that high of a priority right now, but in this case, it's practically useless.

Since it is a cybernet, basically it is desirable to operate with Accesscode Talker.
It's a quick-play spell removal that can be used for sacrifice escapes, but the basic 2:1 exchange weighs heavily on heavy-duty Cybers.
However, since it is Aichi, it is easy to search, and since FWD has disappeared, I feel that there is a lack of removal, so I think that the value of such removal is not low.
It's very convenient, but I get the impression that Deck can be used in Cybers as well.

If it's vanilla, it's a tuner with looser conditions than Photosla, which can be deployed even if there are cards on your field. Since the same category has vanilla links, it is easy to satisfy this condition.
In addition, the recovery effect can be exhibited under conditions similar to 1. If this is also the same category, it is easy to fill and easy to get ads. There is no limit to the same name, so it is possible to repeat collection.
The status aspect is also excellent, and it can be used as a material for Naturia S.
A tuner with high versatility when viewed comprehensively. Mr. Hikomon also mentioned that, even though the level and race are different, in the previous pack, Coelo, who has similar development abilities, was given such restrictions, but this is not the same quality as usual. I feel Is it the difference between anime and OCG?

V finally categorized. Permanence that was in the original is reproduced. This is the first monster to be his Continuous Trap.
Since it can be activated from GY, it's dark, so it's easy to send him to GY, and I definitely want to use it together with Vion in the same category.
Although you are asked for a board ad, you can deploy yourself and it is easy to recover the loss due to the recruitment effect. I would like to aim for further development by connecting it to Cross or Isolde as it is.
It's not bad, but I can't think of HERO as a way to easily pull the trigger of 1. There is dynamite for HERO, but that is a little slow. Zephyros, Trick Crown, etc. may need to be sent on business trips.
The easiest way is to deploy from Faris. With the effect over there, preparations for deployment are ready immediately, leading to mass deployment.
It has an effect that earns ads, and it seems to be the most prioritized existence among V common effects. It seems that he will start a new development of HERO together with Faris.
Frankly speaking, I wonder if this, Faris and Vaion are enough for V. The latter guys are kus... because it's a subtle match.

It's already been said, but what does it mean to pay the hand cost and be lower than the initial enhancement card... It's a different story if at least you have the ability to develop yourself.
Even though it's not narrow, the hand cost is strangely limited, and it feels outdated because it can only be used during your own turn and doesn't last.
It's not that there are no points of differentiation, such as dealing with races and recruiters, but I can't find a particular selling point to prioritize.
I think it's undeniable that this card is lacking in power. Please don't waste resources.

A defensive card that can be activated from your hand, and can self-regenerate at the end. Well, it's not bad to write.
However, I've been talking about it a lot so far, but now that removal is rampant, it's easy to deal with them, and it's impossible to attack directly, and it's a one-time damage cut limited to Cybers, so it's not very reliable as a defense card. is not enough.
Self-regeneration is also fatal for cybers who want to rely on the other party and develop slowly.
I'm not saying anything bad about it, but if you don't mind whether it's defense or deployment, and you don't mind being cyber-savvy, there are better ones out there. I think it's hard to prioritize.