HOME　＞　 Card Rating List 　＞　アルバ's Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List

Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List　Showing 3,076 to 3,090 of 5,305

Check out the latest Yu-Gi-Oh! card ratings! You can filter the rating comments by keywords.

	Rating Score・ Review Posting Date
▶︎ Deck	《Queen Bird》 1 アルバ 2018/01/18 17:59 (If it was a lower grade), it has high defense. Considering that even back then there was a vanilla with 2000 defense in the lower class, why is this... Good
▶︎ Deck	《Horn of Light》 1 アルバ 2018/01/18 17:56 Cards that only increase defense power are low in value in this game, and Equip Spell, which only increases 800 and can't surprise attack, has little existence value. "United We Stand" would be fine. Well, it's an early card, so if he has a card that raises ATK, I can understand that there is such a card. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Black Pendant》 5 アルバ 2018/01/18 17:52 As an Equip Spell used for beatdown, the increase value and additional effect are insufficient. It is practically exclusive to 《Reversal Quiz》and has a glorious role as a finisher there, but it is almost never equipped. Good
▶︎ Deck	《World Legacy - "World Lance"》 9 アルバ 2018/01/16 23:22 Link Monster's combat support and Link Monster's meta hand trigger. When fighting with Link Monsters, he lowers his opponent's ATK, but the number is 3000, which is unusually large. Even 《Linkuriboh》can trade up to 3300, so if you activate Link Monster, you can defeat most monsters in battle. Link Monsters, on the other hand, are usually killed when thrown. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Magicalized Fusion》 10 アルバ 2018/01/16 22:59 The included quintet looks like his Spellcaster version of FGD, so this is his Spellcaster version of Dragon Mirror? It's a card that I really wanted to put out in a quintet, but the other candidates would be Midrash, Black Paladin, and Supreme Magician. Currently, there are not many candidates. Anyway, the more useful Spellcaster Fusion Monsters you have, the more opportunities you have for this card. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Quintet Magician》 9 アルバ 2018/01/16 22:51 "Cannot be released" as an intentional resilience has finally come out. Furthermore, at 4500 hit points, the effect cannot be destroyed, it cannot be used as a fusion material, and super fusion cannot be removed. Since it eats normally, the resistance is not that strong. Well, considering the RBI, it's still strong enough. Fusion materials are heavy at 5 bodies, but it is possible to keep the consumption low because of 《Magicalized Fusion》and Future Fusion. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Monster Reborn Reborn》 6 アルバ 2018/01/15 22:53 The card name I want Malik to say. It's weak point is that it depends on the opponent what can be revived with Normal Spell, which can revive anything, but it can be activated if there are not 3 monsters in GY, so it is also worrisome that there is a slight delay. Cards that are not selected are excluded, so he wants to use GY, but he excludes GY, which creates a contradiction. It's tough to use as a general-purpose resurrection, so it's tough if you can't make use of the cards that weren't chosen to the point of banishing them. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Waking the Dragon》 6 アルバ 2018/01/15 22:46 A card that is a literal minefield. If it is delayed from the field to GY, it can be destroyed, and not only can he be sent to GY, but it can also be banished, so it can counter ban cards such as Cosmic Cyclone, which makes this kind of card cry. As long as he can get a Special Summon in return, he can pull any monster he likes from the Deck or Extra Deck, so the range is very wide. However, it doesn't have any other effects, and the fate of this kind of card is that it's completely dependent on the opponent, and it's still a matter of luck. This type of bluff card has a fairly high return, so I would like to try it. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Cybersal Cyclone》 1 アルバ 2018/01/13 20:33 First of all, you have to prepare a Link Monster with the same number of links as your opponent in GY to activate it, so it takes a lot of work. In this case, you can escape completely, so there is an additional effect, but the Link Monster to be excluded needs to be Cybers, and you can only shoot Twister. Although it is a 1:2 exchange, the reward is weak for the effort, and the opponent may not use the Spell Trap that remains on the face side, so it is undeniable that it feels twitchy. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Mamemaki》 4 アルバ 2018/01/13 20:14 At first glance, it sounds good to say that you can change your hand and remove cards at the same time, but you need as many cards in your hand as your opponent's level. Moreover, since it is returned to the hand, it is not possible to get an add, and even if you aim for an extra, the level of fusion and synchronization is too high (the number of required cards in your hand is too large), and since link and xyz are not compatible, it is difficult to use against extras. . Therefore, his opponent's deck is quite picky, but he may do well against his deck, which is mainly level 2 or lower. I think it would be nice if links and ranks were also supported, but since the draw is involved, is it dangerous to expand the range of support too much? Good
▶︎ Deck	《Ghost Belle & Haunted Mansion》 9 アルバ 2018/01/13 11:21 It's a general-purpose meta level 3 tuner that comes out in winter, and it's reminiscent of 3 effects and Urara, but compared to that, it's very weak because it chooses opponents. Or rather, I think it's just an anomaly that there's no problem even if you put 3 copies without thinking, and it's a no-cost hand trigger. His rivals are DD Crow and Longinus, and DD Crow has a particularly large presence. If you compare it to DD Crow, you can't banish it, but you can completely stop the effects of touching multiple cards such as cards that don't target, Solcha, Explosion, etc., and you can deal with the effects of touching his own GY. Although it is a one-shot only, the advantage is that it does not choose the activation timing. If you use it as a simple GY meta, there are many scenes where it is inferior to DD Crow, so I think it is important that he can stop unexpected cards if GY is included in the range of his effect. Since it can be used as a Crow meta from the first turn, it seems that there is also a turn around it. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Called by the Grave》 9 アルバ 2018/01/13 11:06 One of the many GY metas in this bullet, DD Crow limited to Quick-Play Spell version monsters. With this alone, DD Crow is enough, so you can negate the effect of the monster with the same name as the banished monster until the end of the next turn. From the effects in the second half, he can also use the monster effect meta rather than the GY meta, and he can chain to the effect activated by GY and remove the card to negate the effect. The range to negate is everything regardless of field or GY, so it can also be a hand trigger meta, but be careful that your own hand trigger is also sealed. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Heartless Drop Off》 6 アルバ 2018/01/13 10:58 I feel like there are a lot of GY metas this time around. It's been a long time since I've been knocked out, but this time he's not Deck, but Field and he's GY. If you use it as a meta for GY Salvage, DD Crow will be enough if you have one, so you will want to aim for a card that salvages multiple copies. It can be activated even if you return it to your hand with your own effect, so if you combine it with a card that can bounce multiple cards such as Metaion, you can do a combo that removes all the returned cards. Good ( 2 )
▶︎ Deck	《Boycotton》 1 アルバ 2018/01/13 10:49 As a lower class, it has a high defense power of 2500, but it has a novel text that says "I take battle damage that the opponent receives", and unless it is hit by 2500 RBI, it will be destroyed in battle or returned to its own hand. It's coming. It doesn't do the reflective damage you expect from a low-level wall or survive the field to become a material for the next turn. There is a defensive guy who has a disadvantage in terms of high defensive power but plays a role. Speaking of Norare, it is a card that seems to be Norare. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Shield Crush》 5 アルバ 2018/01/12 18:53 Defense Position A card that serves as a basis for one of the destruction cards. It's a no-cost 1:1 exchange removal, but the back defense is often used for elimination, and the front defense is often enough for ground breaking. To the extent that if a theme based on front side defense affairs comes out, it may be given top priority. Good ( 1 )