HOME　＞　 Card Rating List 　＞　シエスタ's Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List

Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List　Showing 1,681 to 1,695 of 7,624

Check out the latest Yu-Gi-Oh! card ratings! You can filter the rating comments by keywords.

	Rating Score・ Review Posting Date
▶︎ Deck	《Dynatherium》 6 シエスタ 2020/06/16 9:20 The fact that it can be deployed regardless of the situation of the field or hand is an advantage over other level 4 general-purpose deployment cards, but such a thing is not free and allows the opponent to revive. Like Gyrazaurus, which has a similar name, it's nothing to worry about in the early stages, but it tends to be influenced by the situation. There is also a combo that takes advantage of preparing monsters on the opponent's field, but since it's an optional choice, it's also a bit unstable. I feel like it's a habit, but now that the speed is increasing, this disadvantage is no longer something to worry about, and there's a good chance that it will be prioritized depending on the environment. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Silent Wobby》 6 シエスタ 2020/06/16 9:04 A fish that can be sent directly from your hand to your opponent's field. However, it gives the opponent 1 draw. As compensation, I received 2000 LP gain, but if you think about it normally, it's not worth it. The limit on the number of cards in your hand is useless depending on the opponent's deck and the situation, and since there is no limit on summoning in the first place, it is easy to be processed as a material. Basically, I want to use it as a target or as a support for cards that have summoning and effect activation conditions like Sydra. It has the effect of forcibly activating on the opponent's field during your turn, so it's suitable for triggers such as three battles. It also interferes with cards like Infinite Impermanence and Lightning Storm that require an empty field. It relies heavily on combos, but its usefulness has improved with an increase in its card pool. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Big Belly Knight》 4 シエスタ 2020/06/16 8:57 If I was concerned with 3, I wanted myself to be level 3 obediently. It has a deployment effect, but it's a roundabout assumption that the X summoning is successful, and even though your own level is 4, you can only deploy 3, which is a bad match with the X Deck, which tends to require level consistency. If you're level 3-4, it's not that difficult to build a hubrit, but I think it's a card with a strong peculiarity. Good ( 2 )
▶︎ Deck	《Kagemucha Knight》 7 シエスタ 2020/06/16 8:52 As has been said, level 3 《Kagetokage》. At level 3, there are a lot of cards such as forwards and psychos, so there is a strong need to find out what makes this card unique. It's a blessed darkness and 0 offense and defense, so it won't be difficult to differentiate. Of course, the value of using them together is also high due to their respective characteristics. I think that it is one that is easy to handle. Good ( 3 )
▶︎ Deck	《Fine》 1 シエスタ 2020/06/15 14:54 It's just an add loss card by itself, so a combo is essential if you want to use it effectively. However, there are many similar effects that can work better than this, so this should be prioritized only by licking. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Double Tag Team》 3 シエスタ 2020/06/15 14:41 The effect is not weak and the trigger is easier now, but the slowness of Trap is fatal. We can no longer expect things like the old days to be filled with the common effects of Gladiator Beasts. A Continuous Spell, 《Gladiator Rejection》, has also appeared, and the delay has been resolved, and the trigger over there is limited to recruits, but Gladiator Beast is mostly recruited, and you can even receive category searches. This frame no longer exists. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Energy-Absorbing Monolith》 1 シエスタ 2020/06/15 9:40 There are many other more useful burn metas, and Leonidas is a high wall among them. I'm afraid that I can't respond when I'm taken the lead in the burn meta, and it's already lacking in power and will be prioritized. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast's Respite》 5 シエスタ 2020/06/15 9:22 There are no disadvantages after activation, and if there is no turn limit, you can even return to the same name, so I think it's strong if you get hooked. However, as already said, due to the large number of requests, there are many cases where the cards are spoiled, so I think it is a habit of exchanging cards. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Parry》 1 シエスタ 2020/06/15 9:14 The Trap meta is very rich compared to Spell, and there are some Nocos ones. In the case of this card, in addition to requiring a limited hand cost, it does not belong to any category and does not have any additional effects. I would like to say that being able to return Gladiator Beast to the Deck is a point of differentiation, but there are many other ways to do it without difficulty because it is highly dependent on the other party in the first place. There is also a decline in the adoption rate of Trap itself, and it cannot be said that it is a much tougher existence than 《Disarm》. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Disarm》 1 シエスタ 2020/06/15 9:04 The effect itself isn't bad, but there is a Magic Jammer that doesn't care about the cost... Counters that require a hand cost are quite difficult to deal with, but it's not even more limited than that... He doesn't have the name Gladiator Beast, and he can easily deploy Heraclinos, which has a similar effect, with Gladiator Beast, so he probably won't have a turn. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Updraft》 4 シエスタ 2020/06/15 8:59 A card that gives the impression that it can't be underestimated, but it's hard to prioritize. There are many other cards that I want to use Fog Counter, and it tends to be influenced by the situation. Good
▶︎ Deck	《NEX》 2 シエスタ 2020/06/13 17:43 Contrary to the illustration, there are still 2 types of compatible cards, and both are despair of delicate performance when viewed comprehensively. Contacts were reinforced in SAST, but there is nothing special about this card! Considering the future, I will give it 2 points, but I wonder if it is currently practical. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Neo-Spacian Twinkle Moss》 1 シエスタ 2020/06/13 17:37 I think that this guy himself has a strong uncertainty and is a delicate spec. In addition to that, 2 types of specific cards are required, and I'm sorry to say that, but they all have terrible performance, so the performance is not very good for the price. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Sinister Seeds》 2 シエスタ 2020/06/13 15:25 Even though it is possible to generate a large number of tokens without pledges in particular, the conditions are already severe. It is extremely unstable because it is slow and easily influenced by the situation of the field and LP. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Field-Commander Rahz》 4 シエスタ 2020/06/13 15:04 《Archfiend's Oath》can be used in various ways, but it's hard to function on its own and it's highly dependent on combos. The stage is also half-baked. It's not bad, but I don't think it's easy to handle. Good