Amphibious Bugroth MK-11 →Used Deck

Under 《A Legendary Ocean》, it can be summoned without release, and can be destroyed by activation effects.
Also, since this card contains sea text, it can be searched with 《Fish Sonar》.
Looking at it so far, it seems like it can be used in a Sea Deck that uses A Legendary Ocean, but the fact that it destroys face-up monsters other than WATER is quite a bottleneck. If you do not destroy monsters other than the one above, you can lock the deployment.
Also, effect destruction is possible with 《Rage of Kairyu-Shin》and 《Sea Stealth Attack》, so there is little point in destroying this card as a Deck.
Since the Sea Deck has low interference against the background, it may have made sense to use one if it can destroy anything other than monsters.

It was probably created with synergy with Atlantis in mind.
Is target destruction not good enough?
For the time being, let's hope it doesn't become a storage bad debt.

Yes, if there is no sea, you can attack directly with over 25 RBI... you can't attack directly! ? ! ?
Is it the appearance of a card from the 11th generation that finally fulfills the conditions and becomes his ATK of the advanced class, and instead can not attack directly? This is...
If ① is like this, the effect of ② is an unconditional Friche removal, and if there is an ocean, it can be activated twice. There is no effect to Special Summon yourself.
The Mk-3 will be able to attack directly, and it's even degraded. Is it actually a Mk-1.1?

MK-11 because it is the 11th term. I can appreciate the attention to detail, such as having an amphibious effect that can be demonstrated when there is or is not the sea.
However, I wanted the performance to work even harder...
Although he can reduce it with Atlantis, he is an advanced level without a Special Summon effect, and he is too self-reliant to be unable to attack directly due to the strengthening effect, especially when there is no sea. 2550 is by no means low, but it's not a number enough to demerit.
As already said, there is fan service, but for those who don't know or are not interested, it's a card at the level of nothing more than an industrial waste.

A remake card that can only be thought to have been designed by a person who traveled back in time 10 years ago.
Considering the presence of the Kraken that pops out of your hand, wouldn't it have been fine to use Friche for the 2nd effect?

A remake of the remake of the amphibious Bugloss, which seems to be the remake frame of this bosom monster.
When I saw the consideration of MK3 because it was the 3rd generation bugloss, and MK11 because it was the 11th generation bugloss, I thought it made sense.
The level and ATK of the amphibious bugross, the race and defensive power of the ground combat type and MK3's ATK are assigned as their own ability values, and when the sea is not in play, the RBI increases and the ATK is 2550, a monster that cannot attack directly. In addition, when the sea is in play, you get the effect that you can remove a single monster other than WATER on the field every turn.
If the ocean is Atlantis, you can NS without sacrificing, ATK is decent at 2050, and even without the ocean, you can show a different power than when you were there, so in the end, it's better to use it in the ocean! Does it make sense to use it on land? However, I am impressed that the amphibious name is not dated.
However, this card is an 11th season card, isn't it?
I don't need the disadvantage of not being able to attack directly, I think it's okay to be able to SS myself, and the effect that can be shown when there's a sea should be stronger.
Since it's a remake that I personally like very much, I have to make it at least as good as a mimetic man-eating bug. I think it's just treated as a shame, that's all.
By the way, I like the illustrations of the normal amphibious Bugross, or more specifically, the land-based Bugross.