Red-Eyes Zombie Dragon Lord →Used Deck

KONAMI doesn't seem to like undead enhancements, so when you think a new one has finally arrived, it's performance is quite modest.
First of all, offense and defense are low, and since it's a 10-star synchro, either 3000 would have been fine.
Next, the effect is actually only "Revive his GY's undead on the opponent's turn."
However, since monsters of any race can be revived under 《Zombie World》, there seems to be room for interesting combo development.
Personally, I like reviving 《Chaos Hunter》and using 《Baronne de Fleur》over and over again.
You can also rescue 《Doomking Balerdroch》when it looks like it will be banished by your opponent’s 《Called by the Grave》.
The designer probably wants it to be used in combination with 《Skeletal Dragon Felgrand》, but honestly, I can't expect it to be strong enough to require that much effort.
The next undead enhancement is about Wollow, Founder of the Drudge Dragons, and it's a race that has been around since the early days of the original work, and it's not that popular, so I wonder why it's been so coldly treated (because of Zombie World?).

It's based on a combo that resurrects Felgrand and activates its effect during the opponent's turn, and it's certainly a very synergistic combo, but is it a hindrance by lining up two high-level Synchros? The question cannot be wiped out.
Under 《Zombie World》, it seems like it could be set up as an even more flexible obstruction, so depending on how it develops in the future, I have a feeling that it's likely to turn into two points.
If other cards with good synergies increase, it can become a fairly strong card, but at present, it has the same drawback as the original Red-Eyes: "Even if the support is strong, it doesn't lead to meaningful actions." I think you can say that. Unlike the main family, this guy is a "strong support side", so can you have pretty high expectations in the future?
But hey, look...it looks...awesome. When you see it on paper, it looks several times more normal.

zombie redame
It has the effect of reviving the undead on the opponent's turn and the effect of self-ssing the undead on the field as a cost. Perhaps it is an effect that is conscious of the original Redame.
Its main role is to revive and interfere with 《Skeletal Dragon Felgrand》during the opponent's turn. However, unexpectedly, it is difficult to put out this card obediently because there are many cases where the level does not match to put out this card via Fergra.
The cost of self-revive is pretty heavy and even combined with his Shiranui cards it doesn't make up for it.
Although various combos are possible, the performance is quite unreliable as a 10-synchro. Undead 12 Synchro and Rank 10 Undead may change the evaluation.

Although it is limited to the opponent's turn, the effect of reviving GY's Zombie is compatible with the new undead version of Fergrant, and I would like to use it in a set if it is an undead deck that mainly focuses on synchro. Also, the effect of reviving yourself feels expensive and difficult to use, but it meshes with her Shiranui, which earns ads by being removed, and can lead to further development depending on the deck construction.

rotten redame
In other words, it is a figure that has evolved from immortal dragon → immortal dragon → immortal dragon emperor.
Although the firepower is substantially lower than before evolution, the effect is definitely more useful than the immortal dragon, which was garbage.
Ande revive effect limited to opponent's turn
A comparison would be between Bolan and Hel, the King of Death.
Bolan is a No-Cos and has a similar resurrection effect that is limited to the opponent's turn, but this one resurrects Ande from each other's GY and has a wider range than Immortal Dragon Emperor, but the revived undead are removed once they leave the field. I don't want to use it on my own monsters other than Shiranui, but I want to use it for the purpose of borrowing and ripping off opponent's GY monsters under 《Zombie World》.
Also, unlike Immortal Dragon Emperor, it can only be used during the main phase, so there is also the difference that it cannot be used as a countermeasure against the grave that chained to Dohasura's self-revive effect.
Death King Hell requires monsters in the field as a cost, and Death King Hell is a superlative monster that enters the main, so it takes a lot of effort to put it on the field.
On top of that, even if you bring it with Bloom, the undead monster you want to Special Summon directly is Dohasura, and the monster you want to bring to your hand is Eldlich, and Bolan, who will deal with Dohasura that comes to your hand.
On the other hand, Immortal Dragon Emperor is an extra monster, so it's easier to use than Hell, King of Death.
If you use a giant dragon as a material, if you revive a giant dragon on the opponent's turn, it will be the most disturbing no cost.
The point of comparison is that it is possible to revive with a completely free chain instead of being difficult to put out and costly.
There is a self-revive effect and there is no loss effect
Although it is costly, I think it is a good effect that embodies the resilience peculiar to Ande.
If it is Shiranui, you can reduce the cost and add it by excluding the lower Shiranui of the field, so compatibility is good
For level 10S comparisons, Enshin and his other decks have Wall Baroness, which is also way too high.
However, it is possible to coexist with both 《Mad Mauler》and 《Zombie World》.
The Immortal Dragon Emperor himself has no obstruction or suppression effect, but he can cooperate with other Andes and monsters rotted with "Zombie World" to demonstrate his power, and it embodies the connection between races beyond the theme of Zombie. i think it's great new
If the Baroness wasn't there it would have been rated 9.
《Zombie World》R is said to be Doha Surah's flagship monster, and when used in ranking duels and other official games and CS, it has been ridiculed as an undead nowadays. There was no new card deck, but after more than 3 years, I finally got a decent new one.