HOME　＞　Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lists　＞　Structure Deck-Revolver　＞　Zero-Day Blaster

Zero-Day Blaster →Used Deck

Card Kind	Attribute	Level	Type	ATK	DEF

Normal Trap	-	-	-	-	-
Tribute 1 DARK Link Monster, then target cards on the field equal to its Link Rating; destroy them.
Average Rating Score		4.7(10)

Card Info
Card Reviews (10 rating scores)
Decks with Zero-Day Blaster (2 Decks)
Card Category and Effect Category
Products in Japan
Ranking and View Num

"Zero-Day Blaster" card reviews and rating scores

4.7(10)

		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		70%	（7）
		20%	（2）
		10%	（1）

クリアム
2021/02/05 13:37

Only DARK can be released, and only the exact number of link markers can be removed, so if you prepare a high link and remove it with this, you may have to destroy your own place.
On top of that, since this card already has a target when activated, you have to reveal the card you want to destroy when chaining other cards, so you can activate a face-down card that can be broken, etc., and the degree of freedom is relatively low.
However, if it can be combined with 《Lair of Darkness》, the story can be taken in a different direction, but this time there is a problem that if you don't have both at the same time, it will rot (well, assuming you can run without this card when you have Dystopia) )
A disappointing card that seems to play an active role someday but doesn't seem to be right now

Good

青山
2021/02/05 12:20

God darkness link attack, honestly it's pretty heavy
It may be possible to use it in a deck where dark links that are not strong even on the field tend to remain on the field
Hope may be born in unfunny situations like Cherubini standing still when triggered

Good

はわわ
2019/07/15 17:31

It is heavy and the number of sheets is forced by target destruction. Not very performant removal Trap.

Good

アルバ
2019/06/23 19:45

Where it says "Icarus Attack" in the Yami Link version.
Dark Link has 《Linkuriboh》, which is highly versatile and light, so it's easy to prepare, but the number of destroyed cards depends on the number of links, so it's 2:1, so it's a loss.
With a high link, you can aim for mass destruction, but after all there is something called trouble to prepare, and the number of pieces to be destroyed is not "up to" but "only", so the lack of flexibility is also a problem.

Good

りふ
2019/06/22 12:47

It seems to be easy to use for mass removal, and it can be used under much easier conditions than the precipitation of Malebranche of the Burning Abyss... but you can't get a board add unless you have a link of 2 or more, and at the time you use the link as a cost. The cost has already been reduced in terms of the number of cards…
I think there's a point in using him if he chooses the number of link markers and sends GY, but target destruction is in this day and age...
4 Destruction is strong though. If Dark Fluid comes, it will become a romantic cannon called 5 destruction

Good

とき
2019/06/22 9:40

A Normal Trap that releases one DARK Link Monster and destroys as many cards as the number of markers on the field.
It's a so-called Godbird trap, and if you use a DARK Link Monster, it's an excellent free chain removal trap. However, it is undeniably heavy in that it is a trap that requires Link Monsters to be prepared, and this card must target the entire field, and must target the number of Link Monster markers. In other words, if the number of cards on the opponent's field is less than the monster's marker to be released, it explodes and bares its fangs. I don't think it's a bad card for its basic nature.

Good

カンベイ
2019/06/22 8:05

You can expect a considerable removal ability with an effect like 《Icarus Attack》that can remove only the link marker of the DARK link. However, as long as you need Link Monsters, the cost is still a concern, and the fact that you have to remove the same number of Link Markers as you have released is also a bit of a problem in terms of convenience.
Although it has been regulated, it is an answer card that forcibly breaks through the meta against the "Magic Cave" Deck.

Good

プンプン丸
2019/06/21 11:43

It feels like a subspecies of 《Icarus Attack》.
I think Icarus Attack proves the strength of this kind of Friche removal card to some extent. Unlike 《Icarus Attack》, you can put a Dark Link in the EX Deck and change the monsters on the field to Dark Link, so it can be used immediately, so it is easy to put in any Deck, but on the other hand, it costs a little more than a DARK Link Monster and 1 body, so it is a card. Advantage is hard to come by. 　
Well, in the first place, there may be some removal of trap cards in the current environment...

Good

シエスタ
2019/06/21 8:57

His Deck, which deals well with Dark Links, is affordable and easy to use for things like Sacrifice Escape.
Also, since release is involved, it works well with Shadow Dystopia, and you can stack removal on top of removal.
However, even though it is a Friche removal, there is a weight required for the cost of the link, and quality is also required. Also, you have to remove as many markers as you have, and since you can target your own field as well, it can be easily affected by the situation on the field.
I don't think it's a bad card if it works well, but I'd rather stay away from it if the Friche removal makes me feel like this.

Good

wairo
2024/01/06 17:09