Appliancer Breakerbuncle →Used Deck

It's not a bad effect, but it's an effect that doesn't get involved in development, so it tends to slip out of the deck.

Overall Rating: Can protect the Appliancer from combat and effects, but can't be deployed, so it's a bit of a low priority.
The ability to prevent battle destruction and reduce damage to 0 seems important for her low ATK Appliancer.
However, thanks to Appliancer Celtopus, it's easy to get his decent ATK, so preventing battle destruction is more important.
It will be deployed on the next turn and will be attacked by removal.
It is also important to protect it from the destruction of the other effect, but the synergy with the first half is subtle, and if you hold it in your hand, there is a high possibility that the effect will be destroyed before the battle destruction resistance is granted.
I want to summon it as soon as possible and use it as a link material and put it in her GY, but I have no choice but to use "Machine Duplication" because it doesn't have the ability to deploy.

"Appliancer" monsters are all low ATK, so I think the effect of (1) that avoids battle destruction and battles damage is excellent.
Even if you go to GY, you can use the effect of (2) as a substitute for destroying the effects of "Appliancer" monsters, so I don't think it's a waste.

breaker.
It has the effect of giving battle destruction resistance and damage cut by discarding from the hand during the battle of Appliancer, and the effect of substituting his GY or himself for destroying the effect of the Appliancer monster.
A card responsible for the defense of his Appliancer, which has many cards with low stats. It goes well with his Appliancer, which has a lot of Link Monsters with low stats, not only battle destruction resistance, but also damage cut. However, considering the violent environment these days, it seems somewhat unsatisfactory that it can only be used in battles with monsters and that it only protects them.
For the time being, he can respond to effect destruction from GY or the field. However, it tends to be activated after using the hand effect, and this is also not overconfident as it is a one-time only effect. Is it enough to prevent the sudden destruction of the Celtopus?

① is an effect that reduces battles damage while protecting her Appliancer monster from battle destruction by discarding it from the hand. If you look only at this, it is a common resistance-conferring card, but when combined with Laundry Dragon, any high-ATK monster opponent can be brought into one-sided removal, so if you hold it, it will be easy to create an advantageous battle situation.
② is the effect that he can be removed from GY when her Appliancer on the field is destroyed by effect. It is convenient to be able to use it immediately after activating ①, and it would be effective to put it in her GY as a link material in advance.
In addition, both ① and ② do not have the 1 turn limit of the same name, which is rare for this type of effect these days. The ability to gain effect destruction resistance with multiple drops is a welcome effect for his Appliancer Links, who do not have any effect destruction resistance.
If there is a drawback, it is that it does not have an expansion system effect. It's a theme that's unexpectedly difficult to deal with when dealing with summoning rights, so in that case, it's probably safer to allocate it to this card for the time being.