Royal Oppression Forbidden→Used Deck

It goes without saying that Vanity's Emptiness has a strong SS suppression effect.
The true horror of this card is that there was a time when it was possible to hit "non-SS effects of monsters with SS effects" because of the text "Effects that include special summons of monsters' girlfriends".
For example, 《Grandmaster of the Six Samurai》is a no-cost salvage when destroyed, so it was originally a complete meta card, but due to the ruling, it was completely negate if you paid 1600 LP.
Outrageously bad card

The biggest reason why construction theory at the time recommended a main load of 《Mystical Space Typhoon》. There was a time when this was allowed.
There was no problem in the era when normal summon centered on fistfights was the basic, but when he became the ace of the special summon monster itself, the situation changed suddenly. One piece that can be said to be the pioneer of friendship destruction tactics that have been handed down from generation to generation in modern Yu-Gi-Oh, who only land their own ace and do not allow the opponent to deploy. The roots of Yu-Gi-Oh's first advantage are stretched even in the early days.
Due to the errata at the time that clarified the unclear text, it was possible to counter his Special Summon due to the effect, allowing further rampage. It's an effect that fundamentally misunderstands the meaning of equality, but since M.T.G., which is said to be the origin of Yu-Gi-Oh, has made similar mistakes, it's a path that everyone should go through.
Needless to say, it is not an effect that can be allowed in modern times, and the road to mitigation is quite steep now that the name Turn 1 has taken root.

Continuous Trap that negates SS by paying his LP cost with one 《Royal Palace》
A rare card like 《Chicken Game》whose effect can be used on both sides.
Yu-Gi-Oh after the 6th period when S summoning appeared, the heavy use of SS became a common sight
This card came to be used mainly in metabi that doesn't use SS a lot as a meta for it
However, as the speed increases, it becomes natural for the leading side to deploy in large numbers.
By installing this trap as a bonus, you can also achieve preemptive control on the deployment deck.
In the first place, blocking an SS even once would be sufficient interference, so it became possible to enter any deck, but it was banned.
Around here, the junior card 《Vanity's Emptiness》also follows the same ending.
There are cards like 《Blackwing - Vayu the Emblem of Honor》that cannot actually negate.
There was also a dedicated Deck that combined with such a card that could use the SS effect many times

Until 《Imperial Order》and 《Vanity's Emptiness》became banned cards, it was the only trap card called permanent meta trap that was regulated, and it is one of the banned cards "Royal Palace" Continuous Trap series!
Its specifications are packed with the same or more convenience for the user than Skill Drain, and considering that, is it inevitable that Skill Drain will become a restricted card?
If there is one good thing about "Skill Drain", it can be used like "Dark Ruler No More" to completely erase the effects of suppressed monsters that have already been deployed on the field, so it's not even that kind of card. There is no doubt that this card, which has no limit on the number of times it can be played in one turn, was even more evil.

Continuous Trap that can seal Special Summon many times with only LP cost
The effect itself can be used by your opponent, but if you activate this card after deploying it, you can block only the opponent's deployment and attack at once with his Special Summoned monster.
Therefore, it was widely used in deployment decks, and it was designated as a banned card in 2011 because it promoted an absolute advantage.
Considering the pressure and the number of decks that can be used, it can be said that his Continuous Trap is the strongest except Imperial Order before errata.

A tremendous card called 《Solemn Warning》that can be used many times in one turn.
Your opponent can use it, but if you remove it with 《Giant Trunade》or 《Heavy Storm》, you will be able to play one-sidedly.
In the past, he didn't have many Special Summons, so he wasn't that strong, but with the appearance of Synchro, he really turned his fangs on.
He has a heavy LP cost warning, and even Vanity's Emptiness, which can be said to be an adjusted version of this card, is currently banned, so you can't go home for the rest of your life!
But it really helped me when I was a kid. It was a valuable means to counter Synchro.

Comprehensive evaluation: It is very troublesome in that he can negate Special Summon only with LP cost, and it is also possible to do his Special Summon only by himself.
Since it can be used against his opponent's Special Summon in general, it is sufficient as a suppression agent.
The point that he cannot use against Special Summon at the time of battle destruction is a hole, but on the contrary, you can use it yourself to pass his Special Summon, and if you can use it, the impact is great.
The opponent can also use it, but if you use a monster that can be revived many times, the opponent has no point in paying the LP cost, so there is no choice but to pass Special Summon.
Dana is more convenient than the effect of ``he can't special summon each other''.

One of the "Royal Palace" Continuous Trap series, which is currently designated as a banned card, as a permanent meta trap with the SS sealing effect, which is considered to be the most evil existence in the Yu-Gi-Oh OCG.
If it's just to cover up after a lot of deployments, it's possible to do it with nothingness, but the feature of this card is that it has the same nature as Skidre, ``There are SS for which this effect is not effective''.
This card cannot capture the SS in Dameste, and there is a hole that it is meaningless to activate against his GY-activated SS without the name Turn 1. It was also possible to make a construction that could move .
Even the nihilistic version of this card, which can be said to be an adjusted version, is already banned, so it will be difficult to return without errata, and by any chance, it may be like a royal order that re-bans the errata return. If you think about it, don't even think about reviving it with errata in the first place! It is not unreasonable to say that.

Pay only 800 to negate the Special Summon. Banning is appropriate because it is too phony.

A powerful royal card that ranks with imperial orders.
At this cost, it's extremely powerful to be able to block most of his Special Summons with just one copy.
However, it can also be used against opponents, and there are some targets that are not effective, such as summoning during damage, although it is only a small part.
Conversely, it is also possible to use them together with those cards to make it easier for yourself to move.
For a while, it was an environment that didn't use Special Summon a lot, and it wasn't possible to negate his Special Summon due to its effect, so it was a card that didn't stand out.
However, it was later errataed and became effective even with effects, and it suddenly became a major meta card from the 6th term when S summons that used a lot of Special Summon appeared and was restricted.
In the end, it was installed on his deck, which was originally a meta target, on the Special Summon axis. change.
The later errataed edict and Vanity's Emptiness, which is even more difficult to maintain than this card, followed the same path.
His manageable permanent Spell/Summoning negates are no more than a nuisance.

Special Summon Never Forgives 《Vanity's Emptiness》, there is a loophole called damage step. However, these days, cards of that lineage are almost never used, so it's practically meaningless. With the LP cost of 800, it is possible to negate his opponent's Special Summon any number of times. Although it has the disadvantage that it can be used for both sides, it is only possible to interfere with the opponent if it is deployed in the first place. It was a card that encouraged the advantage of going first, and GY Blackwing, which was popular at the time, was a phony deck that only you could get past it. By chaining the effect of 《Black Whirlwind》to the summons of Blizzard of the Far North, as well as Vayu of Great War and Shura of Blue Flame, I was able to eliminate the activation timing of 《Royal Oppression》. To be honest, I don't think that errata will be as exquisite as an imperial order, and it seems that there are only two choices: industrial waste errata or permanent ban.

Although it has the disadvantage of being able to be used by the opponent, it's a good idea to deploy it first and then use it during the opponent's turn. It's one of the most dangerous cards in Yu-Gi-Oh, even if it's errataed on turn 1, it's still going to outperform 《Solemn Warning》.

A Continuous Trap card that negates a Special Summon by paying 800LP. There are very few decks that don't rely on Special Summon, so this card's effect is very easy to hit. If it's an Errata named Turn 1, is there a chance?

The drawback is that the opponent can also use the effect, but when he is passed first, he negates Special Summon many times with only 800 LP, which is not enough for the side to be attacked. I think.
What can't be negate in Dameste is brutal in the sense that it's possible to have a loophole to make the construction work only to your advantage.

A dangerous card that negates Special Summon by paying only 800 LP, at least if there is a turn 1 limit...

One of the strongest Special Summon meta cards
His Deck that doesn't fall for this is a banned card.
When this card was active, it was the card I disliked the most because I used Synchro a lot.

One of the banned cards is Continuous Trap, which negates Special Summon for 800 LP.
There is no limit on the number of times, and the control pressure is high. If you go first, you'll definitely have an advantage.
On the other hand, his Special Summon during the Damage Step, such as Goes and Tragoedia, cannot be negate.

Special Summon negate on 800 LP. However, your opponent can also use it.
The range that can be negate is very wide and almost anything can be negate except for the activation of damage.
In the past, it was a meta card, but before it was banned, it was a feeling that the user could do whatever they wanted with Special Summon, and after creating a lineup to overwhelm it, they would use it as a finishing blow.
Even if it is relaxed, it will only be used in this way, so I don't think it will be relaxed as a Special Summon meta.

If you pass it, you lose
I think he controlled it with one sentence in the second half, but if he doesn't let him use it or if he can win if he keeps hitting, then he wins.

The opponent can't use it, but let the opponent use it. 800 is Burnline. Well, when I was doing it in the dimension Monarch, I piled it up with this guy.
It's obvious that decks that don't use Special Summon do a lot of damage in today's environment. There were many decks that just took my breath away when I gently pointed them to the side.
I think I'm watching Shinkei, but 800 is too light...

The ban was unavoidable because the number of Decks centered on Special Summon increased due to the increase in the card pool. Meta that seals Special Summon. It costs money and is used by opponents, so you can't throw it in without thinking about it, but it's very powerful in the meta.
However, there are Special Summon monsters such as 《Treeborn Frog》and 《The Immortal Bushi》that can coexist with this card, so it is desirable to use them together.

Special Summon meta card.
The LP cost isn't cheap, and although it has the drawback that it can be used by opponents, there is no deck that doesn't do Special Summon, and it's a brutal card that can disrupt most decks' tactics.
On the first turn of the first attack, I deploy monsters to some extent and seal the opponent's special summon, which may have completely nipped the second player's counterattack in the bud, so it is a banned card.

Super villainous card in the Special Summon meta.
Recently, the number of cards that I love to deploy has increased, and the number of Decks that dislike this card should also increase.
The LP cost is a little high, but if you have the confidence to rush, it's fine.
It was a favorite card in his decks such as Gadget and BF.
It's banned now, but the number of his decks that are rampant about it is increasing, so I think it's time for him to come back.

I can't help it.
It's great in the meta, but it pays off as a simple removal once it's activated.

You can negate his Special Summon of various monsters such as Synchro, Fusion, and Xyz.
However, the other party can also use it...

The pinnacle of the Special Summon meta. Even though Iliaster could use this to become a Synchrometa...
In today's world of Special Summons, there are many cards that stick, so even this one card can ruin the concept.
Because of "negate and destroy Special Summon", you don't have to worry about being knocked down by Braro or being stopped by stardust.
It is important to note that you can't do it during a damage step, and that 《Macro Cosmos》and Starro can be completely stopped.
Personally, I thought it would be fine to relax, but is it prohibited?

Speaking of Special Summon meta, this card.
The LP cost itself isn't cheap, but it's much better than allowing a Special Summon.
The hole that can't be activated in the damage step is also that your side can also do his special summon in the damage step.
Special Summon It's a power card with unparalleled brutality in the best environments, and it's finally banned. There are so many decks that can be filled with this one card, and it feels like a card that can win just by sticking and maintaining it, so it can't be helped.

GY BF's fault

A card that blows away your opponent's plans with this one card.
It's only been in my hand once during the duel,
At that time, thanks to this guy, I was able to blow away the opponent's synchro.