HOME　＞　Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lists　＞　Threat of the Dark Demon World　＞　Spell Reproduction

Spell Reproduction →Used Deck

Card Kind	Attribute	Level	Type	ATK	DEF

Normal Spell	-	-	-	-	-
Send 2 Spells from your hand to the GY, then target 1 Spell in your GY; add it to your hand.
password：29228529
Average Rating Score		2.3(15)

Card Info
Card Reviews (15 rating scores)
Decks with Spell Reproduction (27 Decks)
Card Category and Effect Category
Products in Japan
Ranking and View Num

"Spell Reproduction" card reviews and rating scores

2.3(15)

		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		6%	（1）
		26%	（4）
		66%	（10）

金目鯛融合
2022/11/03 14:06

If you really want to reuse it, it's better to use 《Magical Stone Excavation》as others have said. Even with that, there is a disadvantage, so...

Good

みめっと
2022/11/03 14:00

In the original Battle City arc, Ishizu's spell card was discarded from his hand by Kaiba due to the effect of Dragged Down into the Grave activated by himself.
It has a powerful effect that allows GY to reuse his spell cards, but since he requires two spell cards for the activation cost, it's a pity that it's better than Magical Stone Excavation, which doesn't care about the type of cost. I can't wait.
From the fact that it was recorded as normal from the beginning, it can be seen that the adjustments have been made with a lot of consideration for the feet.

Good ( 1 )

ねこーら
2021/08/06 0:22

Comprehensive evaluation:《Magical Stone Excavation》is good.
This one is only backwards compatible with that as the hand cost is limited to his spell cards.
There's a difference between throwing it away and sending it to GY, but it's insignificant.

Good ( 1 )

シエスタ
2020/05/27 9:05

Although it is said a lot, backward compatibility of mining. Due to its characteristics, it is mainly used for spells, but the bottleneck is that it is very expensive.
The activity of this guy will be affected by the activity of mining and the regulation condition.

Good

プンプン丸
2020/05/27 8:37

Lower card of 《Magical Stone Excavation》
Magical Stone Excavation was also restricted for a time after being abused by cards that reuse his spells, so it's possible that this card could be used as a substitute. 　

Good

wairo
2020/05/26 21:40

《Magical Stone Excavation》backward compatible card
In the past, that was the limit, so it was adopted from the second one onwards.

Good

サンパイ
2020/05/26 16:01

Use 《Magical Stone Excavation》.
Since the cost is limited, it is impossible to mine the fourth and subsequent cards.
At least let me throw away the monsters...

Good

アルバ
2016/09/23 3:51

It's the same as 《Magical Stone Excavation》, just specifying the card that can be used as a cost, so it's completely backward compatible.
However, most of the decks that can fit him are solitaire one-kill decks that have a lot of spells, and he is also used as a fill-in for mining, which is also lacking.

Good

ヒコモン
2016/02/18 12:54

In just one year, "Magical Stone Excavation", which should be said to be upwardly compatible, appeared and suddenly lost its position. Even mining without specifying a card can spoil due to the weight of the cost, but besides this card, he needs 2 spell cards and it is very easy to spoil. Mining was restricted and it regained some of its presence, but now that it's unlimited, it's almost impossible to use this guy.

Good ( 1 )

かのん
2015/03/21 18:43

Well, you can see that it's weaker than mining
When mining is not enough, you can also put this in.

Good

ファイア野郎
2014/01/01 22:50

A card that can be said to be backward compatible with 《Magical Stone Excavation》.
Unlike over there, the point that the cost is specified is a tough place.
Basically, one card that is used when two cards are thrown in and it is still not enough.

Good

スクラップトリトドン
2011/04/28 21:56

Basically, mining after the 3rd sheet.
Metapo, Library Exo, etc. are included with 1 Kill Deck, but it is undeniable that mining is completely backward compatible...

Good

とき
2011/04/13 12:32

Spell card salvage is valuable, but almost upward compatible 《Magical Stone Excavation》.
The only difference is that it's sent to GY instead of being discarded, but it's a spell card so what's the point?
Throwing it away is better than sending it to GY because it's not affected by dimension.

Good

NEOS
2010/10/08 0:15