HOME　＞　 Card Rating List 　＞　アメメ's Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List

Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List　Showing 1 to 15 of 217

Check out the latest Yu-Gi-Oh! card ratings! You can filter the rating comments by keywords.

	Rating Score・ Review Posting Date
▶︎ Deck	《Grenosaurus》 3 アメメ 2017/09/21 2:00 It can deal 1000 burns and moderate damage, but is there anything severe with this RBI and conditions? I think it will be easier to handle if you strengthen ATK I can't imagine the situation too much, but isn't it bad to try to stop it? Good
▶︎ Deck	《Soul of Silvermountain》 5 アメメ 2017/09/20 1:15 Rank 3 monster with a tie The effect of 1 is severe now that there are only free chains and summoning reaction systems The effect of 2 is excellent, but it is doubtful whether it can be used because the important RBI is low Overall impression of a subtle card Good
▶︎ Deck	《Mechquipped Angineer》 9 アメメ 2017/09/20 1:01 One general-purpose rank 3 Each monster can be given resistance, making it easy to handle If there are other monsters next to you when you're about to be eliminated, it's good to be able to leave while granting resistance as a souvenir. Personally, I prefer this to Wind-Up. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Goyo Defender》 1 アメメ 2017/09/20 0:54 victims of the new rules If you just use it normally, no matter how hard you try, you can't use the effect of 1 For the time being, if you revive only one of this guy from his GY when your field is empty, or use the opponent's link destination, you can call only one more for free, but I don't think it's worth aiming for. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Meliae of the Trees》 9 アメメ 2017/09/20 0:50 Although the restrictions are strict, it has both the effects of "Back to the Front" and "Plant-only charm" Both are pretty nice effects for Plant, and come in handy for solitaire. However, since the RBI is low, it would be better to think that it is basically a one-time cut. In the past, it was easy to get it out of Goyo Defender with 3 consecutive hits, but that is also a thing of the past. It may have become difficult to handle with the new rules, but I would like to expect it in the future Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Number 17: Leviathan Dragon》 3 アメメ 2017/09/20 0:42 One general-purpose rank 3 As it appeared in the early stage of Xyz, it has quite subtle performance Dante's existence hurts, basically it seems that this is fine postscript ↑ yes? That's why it says "basically", right? I know I can get 3000 RBI, but it's difficult to maintain 2 turns. ↑Additional notes What is this... did you read the article properly? You wrote "basically, comprehensively" In other words, as you wrote, Dante is better than Dante except for limited scenes such as this guy is more alive than Dante, or he doesn't want to fertilize GY. From the end, I wrote "basically, comprehensively" with the nuance that it is different from Dante to be able to get 3000 points, even though it has disadvantages, but didn't you get it? Of course, the role is different from Dante's, but should I give priority to such a limited scene, or should I divide the frame for both? I gave it a low rating in that sense. I'm a huge fan of Decks and he only does Rank 3. I don't know, but I hate being compared to Dante Good ( 5 )
▶︎ Deck	《Wind-Up Zenmaines》 7 アメメ 2017/09/20 0:38 One general-purpose rank 3 At Rank 3, it is valuable and has excellent resistance, but since the removal effect is forced and includes your own field, it is often difficult to handle and it is often felt to be a hindrance. Nowadays, removal other than destruction is commonplace, so it's better not to overestimate even if it has resistance that can be easily put out. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Leviair the Sea Dragon》 9 アメメ 2017/09/20 0:32 One of the best rank 3 cards. The new rules may have made things a little more difficult Picks Deck, but is pretty good as a support and facilitator Good
▶︎ Deck	《Phoenix Wing Wind Blast》 8 アメメ 2017/09/18 10:40 One general-purpose Trap Deck has an effect that can be said to be a top bounce version of Thunder Break Hand cost is expensive, but if you can remove resist and drawlock, it's barely worth it However, if you want to remove his permanent Spell Trap and Field Spell, can you say that Thunder Break is better? Well, the recent permanent cards are all about activating some kind of effect when destroyed... Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Raigeki Break》 7 アメメ 2017/09/18 10:33 One general-purpose Trap It can be said that it is a reasonable effect, but the hand cost is painful I remember being hired for a while when the acting angel was top environmental. However, it cannot be denied that this evaluation is not worth the cost, including the current inflation. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Pot of Desires》 10 アメメ 2017/09/18 9:30 General-purpose Spell ... This card I don't know if it can be said At first glance, any of him would fit in the deck, but when he sacrificed 10 decks to activate it, it wasn't so unexpected, and I felt that he needed to put it in while thinking about deck construction. It is an impression that it is an unexpectedly good adjustment, but it seems that it will not be strange if regulations are imposed at some point Good
▶︎ Deck	《Shield Crush》 5 アメメ 2017/09/18 9:15 Advantages and disadvantages of the use of erasure It's inferior to that in terms of meta performance, but is this one better in terms of ease of handling? If you say that there is not much significance in investing now, it will be until then Good
▶︎ Deck	《Nobleman of Crossout》 6 アメメ 2017/09/18 9:10 Reverse monster removal card Compared to 《Shield Crush》, it can only remove the back side, but it is excluded, and if it is a Flip Monster, it can destroy the same name. I don't see it being used at all now, but it seems to work reasonably well in the Shaddoll and Ghostrick meta. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Tribe-Infecting Virus》 6 アメメ 2017/09/14 15:50 was finally released I can't think of a vision that will be used in the future... In any case, the next revision will be a quasi, and the next revision will be an unlimited course. Is it still used in Mermail or Fabled? Good
▶︎ Deck	《Fissure》 4 アメメ 2017/09/14 8:21 It's an excellent effect, but the existence of landslides and black holes hurts In that case, you would put in 2 Black Holes and 3 Ground Smashers and then put this card in, but I don't think there is such a slot, and he puts the above 2 cards in the deck so much in the first place. for no reason Unlike Earth Smasher, it has the advantage of being able to remove Link Monsters, but I doubt it's necessary for that reason alone. Good