HOME　＞　 Card Rating List 　＞　シエスタ's Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List

Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List　Showing 3,496 to 3,510 of 7,624

Check out the latest Yu-Gi-Oh! card ratings! You can filter the rating comments by keywords.

	Rating Score・ Review Posting Date
▶︎ Deck	《Tri-Gate Wizard》 8 シエスタ 2019/10/08 14:39 Although the material is loosely specified, it cannot be placed in the EX zone due to its marker direction and effect characteristics, and it requires a large number of links to fully demonstrate, so it is heavy and requires considerable deployment power. Although it takes a lot of time and effort, it has excellent effects and the stats are low, but if you are in a situation where you can fully demonstrate the effects of this card, you will not be able to break through it. Is it a card for solitaire that is centered on links? Good
▶︎ Deck	《Diamond Dire Wolf》 7 シエスタ 2019/10/08 10:55 It's a Skudra exclusively for Rank 4 Beasts, but it's not material-bound. With No-Cos removal spells all over the place, the simple specs pale in comparison. However, as already said, self-destruction and removal are useful in certain decks. It can be used as a trigger for a card that is activated when it is destroyed, or it can be used in a variety of ways, such as opening a monster zone. All-purpose removal is also a valuable existence at rank 4. It gives the impression that it is for combos, and I think there are still many opportunities to play an active role. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Lightning Chidori》 7 シエスタ 2019/10/08 10:40 Compared to Castel, who has the same Deck bounce, he is tied to the wind and has 100 more offense and defense. However, it's difficult to keep the stats low, and set bounces are mostly frits and counters, regardless of monsters. To be honest, I feel that the performance is... despite the material restrictions. Well, if it's a deck that can be put out without difficulty, it's still worth adopting. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Firefly》 2 シエスタ 2019/10/07 17:25 It's a peeping that doesn't lead to advertising by itself, and it's an honest impression to say that it's not doing such a roundabout thing as it's been said. The increase in level and stats is too weak to be talked about, and there are Gulfs that are even more adjustable. Although it is compatible with 141, the advantage of current Inzek is thin. If even an insect version of Isolde comes out... well, that's going to be tough. Good ( 2 )
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Earwig》 3 シエスタ 2019/10/07 16:23 Similar to Dansel, it has a strengthening effect in the equipped state as a unique effect, and the strengthening can be continued even if you go to GY, so it is strong against removal as equipment. However, there is a highly stable Gigaman for strengthening. Over there you can equip yourself and have a useful resurrection effect. In the current era of rampant removal, it is difficult to keep strengthening, and it is quite bad. Above all, the fact that he cannot actively go to GY is very painful for Dansel Senchi. The hopper exists even in the development from hatching. There is also a point of differentiation that makes use of lower stats than over there, but such cards are often impurities for Inzek. I think it's a tough existence. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Orb》 2 シエスタ 2019/10/07 15:03 The enhancement value is extraordinary, and Trap tends to be one step behind as a resistance attachment, and it has a flaw that it can't be done in time to activate the chain. Although it is easy to search, this is not the case... I think it's out of the hiring range. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Variable Form》 3 シエスタ 2019/10/07 14:51 It has a variety of uses and interesting moves, but Inzek doesn't have a search advantage, Trap doesn't have a quick attack, and there's no need to do such a roundabout thing. In Zek's board surface after deployment is often not lined up with Inzek. To be honest, I don't think it's a card that's out of the realm of jokes. Good ( 3 )
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Axe - Zektahawk》 2 シエスタ 2019/10/07 14:23 《Axe of Despair》for Inzek. Uri has the same effect of blocking magic and traps as the ancient machine, but now that Friche is the mainstream, this Uri is very weak, and there is almost no difference even though it is dedicated to the category. In the first place, attack reactions are like food for Inzek. Inzek itself has little need for enhanced equipment, and considering that it is easy to search, I think it is impossible to prioritize it as long as the caliber exists. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Crossbow - Zektarrow》 4 シエスタ 2019/10/07 14:18 Enhancing is a bonus, and you'll be relying more on chain sealing. It is very useful in the current environment where there are many disturbing cards with high surprise attacks such as hand triggers. There are just too many holes. Depending on the opponent's playing, it's easy to get tired of the hole, and after all, the strength against Friche is subtle. It's not an effect that leads to development, so there's a risk that it'll spoil, and I think it's hard to prioritize even if you can search for it. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Sword - Zektkaliber》 7 シエスタ 2019/10/07 14:11 It's mediocre as a power-up card, and since Inzek has high removal power and can easily be connected to general-purpose Link X, I don't feel the need for power-up equipment, but since it has the name of Inzek, it's easy to search for, and it has a recovery effect, so it's a condition. It's also loose, so it's easy to activate. The value increased after the Dansel regulation. After the deregulation of Inzek, it is no longer as valuable as before, but it is possible to aim to deploy the recovered Inzek around Skaldet. With the increased card pool, it became possible to perform different moves. It's a card that expands the range of tactics. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Exa-Stag》 5 シエスタ 2019/10/07 10:31 Level 5 insects have a very thin layer, and honestly don't have the ability to put out a lot of effort. On the other hand, Inzek only has Dansel and Gruff, so there are many opportunities to put it out more than Beetle. Like the Beetle, it has the effect of equipping and strengthening, but instead of being limited to the opponent, it can also target the field. High removal power. However, the original RBI is low and the strengthening tends to depend on the opponent, so it cannot be relied on as an attacker. You will need to supplement with a guide. Although it has a subtle performance, it is a removal method other than destruction, so it was a reliable existence in Inzek, but since there are more excellent existences that can be released without difficulty, it has become difficult to take out the frame of this card. It's gone. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Inzektor Exa-Beetle》 7 シエスタ 2019/10/07 9:48 Inzektor is mainly level 3, but if you consider the ability to deploy from Gulf and Dansel, it's not so hard to put out. The raw RBI is low, but it will be compensated by its own effect. If you're just aiming to strengthen, the opponent's GY is unstable, so if possible, you want to prepare yourself. It has an effect similar to Skudra, and his GY sending and removal performance are high. The cost is also procured by its own effect. However, since the RBI will return to its original state, I would like to supplement it with some kind of material such as a guidera or link. For Inzek, it's nice to have removal other than destruction, but there are cards with bounce that are easier to play than this card. is thin, so the priority is not high. If anything, he'll use his own uniqueness to call in other of his decks. As already mentioned, you can combo with cards that can be activated away from the field. I think it's an interesting card for entertainment. Good ( 2 )
▶︎ Deck	《Catoblepas and the Witch of Fate》 6 シエスタ 2019/10/05 17:18 As it is said a lot, what is the RBI? 's powerful theme, Zoodiac, attracted attention for a while. When it first appeared, it was probably intended for use with Fortune Lady. Special Summon, which is a daily occurrence, can be destroyed without turn restrictions as long as there is a GY cost, and compared to Pakike, it is an excellent effect if it has a lower attacker level with an average stat. What is it? As he is the center of , it is unstable to secure the cost unless it is a deck, and since he does not negate summoning, there are holes such as destruction resistance and summoning triggering powerlessness. RBI? Even with a deck centered on , in the end, I can't get category support, secure summoning rights, I'm not good at GY fertilizer, or his deck emphasizes GY ads, so I feel it's not good enough. tend to be forced I think it has great potential. It's an era where many things have been completed within the theme since about the 6th term, so I have the impression that the priority and future prospects are low. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Regulus》 2 シエスタ 2019/10/05 16:20 If it's a regulated field, it's usually easy to search, so it seems worth returning it, but there's probably no slot for using this card in a deck that uses such a card. It is possible to secure search targets for Terrafo Metaba, but there is no frame for this guy, and those searches are becoming even worse because of restrictions. The status is also subtle, and the performance really leaves an impression. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gemini Spark》 7 シエスタ 2019/10/05 11:43 The target of the cost is somewhat limited, but it can be used quickly and without loss, and it is easy to use. His work with Ananeo left a strong impression on me. However, compared to Godova, it is more flexible, but in the current inflationary environment, there are more and more cases where removing one card does not have much impact. Also, there are many Duals with different levels, and the Ana Neobeat, which was often used in the past, has been left behind, so there are currently few Decks that are easy to prioritize. It has a lot of potential, but I get the impression that it's an unlucky card at the moment. I think that high playing skill is also required. Good