HOME　＞　 Card Rating List 　＞　シエスタ's Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List

Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List　Showing 3,196 to 3,210 of 7,624

Check out the latest Yu-Gi-Oh! card ratings! You can filter the rating comments by keywords.

	Rating Score・ Review Posting Date
▶︎ Deck	《Dragunity Legionnaire》 6 シエスタ 2019/11/15 17:18 One of the drags that has equipment effects, and has virtually no cost removal. Removal that doesn't rely on Special Summon is valuable to drag. However, in the drag that does not function by itself and is centered on the basic even level S, the level 3 is a deck that is a little difficult to handle and the summoning right is severe. I think that the cost of kicking is no longer worth the single removal. However, being easy to search is a big differentiator from other general-purpose removals. If I were to adopt it, I think it would be a pin or a side. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Dragunity Javelin》 1 シエスタ 2019/11/15 16:54 Activation itself is not so difficult because you can activate it even if you split it yourself, but when you equip it, there is no effect and it becomes a story of "So what are you doing?" With Militum, you can aim for deployment, but it is not a high-priority card, and Phalanx of the same level can be deployed in a natural flow. After all, it has come to the point that it is not compatible with harmony. Despite its high reliance on combos, there is almost no reward, so I think it's a card that can be called an industrial waste. I felt only ill will that Strak reprinted this guy instead of the Phalanx. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Dragunity Brandistock》 4 シエスタ 2019/11/15 15:05 You can attack the equipped monster twice, but you need help from other cards to equip this card. Cyberdark and Drag are easy to equip, but the former has Renling, and the original card has good compatibility cards such as Gae Bolg, but level 1 is difficult to use and there is no frame to adopt. I have the impression that there are many other actions that I want to prioritize and I can't afford to do. For the time being, you can aim to activate it with various decks by using Dragon Manipulation and Union Carriers, but it doesn't seem worth it. In any case, I think it is difficult to give priority to the current situation. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Dragunity Knight - Trident》 5 シエスタ 2019/11/15 10:01 For reasons I'll explain later, I had the impression that when it came to Trident in Dragunity, he was more of a Dragion rather than this guy. EX peeping/destruction, and being able to choose arbitrarily is still a relatively valuable existence. The problem is that the material specification is double bound, each requires a different race, and the effect is to cut the board add and the consumption is intense. Dragunity deals with base even-level S, so level 7 is tricky. However, due to the expansion of the card pool, it is no longer a difficult story because of the presence of Guiserm, Destrudo, and Tsiolkin. If you get addicted to it, you can advance the battle to your advantage, but its success is easily influenced by the opponent and the situation, so it's a difficult card to handle. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Trident Dragion》 7 シエスタ 2019/11/15 9:14 Both tuners and non-tuners demand Dragons, but compared to when they first appeared, the number of dragon tuners has increased considerably, so the summoning itself has become easier. Since it is a high level, summoning it tends to take some time and effort, and in order to demonstrate its effect, it requires a board add, which is very heavy. However, there is a reasonable reward because it can demonstrate continuous attacks of 3000 RBI and explosive power of 1 kill class. Since the destruction of this card is due to effects, it is also a relief that the loss is small even if it receives a bubble shadow. Since I'm using this card, I'd like to go for a victory even if it's a little unreasonable. I think that the word "robust" is appropriate for this card. Good ( 2 )
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Lady Lapis Lazuli》 9 シエスタ 2019/11/14 16:58 Summoning is easy if you have a Gem-Knight card pool, and you can burn her Gem-Knight in Deck/EX with reference to his Special Summoned card at the cost. The expected value is high because it includes your own field and has the ability to deploy gems, so a burn of about 1500 is a piece of cake. In addition, it can be said that the cost is already a merit effect. It can perform various functions such as generating the collection cost of Fusion, sending Lazuli to salvage, and preparing copies of master diamonds. I think it's an excellent card that not only works as a combo part, but also has decent performance on its own. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Iolite》 3 シエスタ 2019/11/14 14:59 Gem-Knight has a lot of rotation power, so I don't think he's going to have a problem with GY cost even considering Fusion. However, if you ask me if I want to summon him again, it would be difficult. Exclusion zones have become easier to reuse with Phantom roots, and the deployment destination of Aqua is also subtle. Along with other Dual Gems, I don't think it's possible to prioritize Gem-Knight at the moment. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Sardonyx》 2 シエスタ 2019/11/14 14:52 Gem-Knight has a universal search effect, but it takes time to summon again and is destroyed in battle. The RBI is also a mediocre number of 1800, and Gem-Knight is mainly a deck that leads to fusion. In addition, there are many other, looser search means. Even considering some of the differentiating points and the all-purpose search, I can't give it a very high rating. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Amber》 3 シエスタ 2019/11/14 14:47 The collection target is all monsters, but her Gem-Knight is required for the cost, so it will inevitably be handled mainly by her Gem-Knight. The synergy with Fusion, which can generate collection targets and costs at the same time, is strong. However, since it is a Dual, it takes time to summon again. I don't use dual support for gems. If that's all it is, it's fine, but with the introduction of other excellent new cards, especially Phantom Roots, it's now possible to use the exclusion zone without difficulty, so it's safe to say that this card's turn has almost disappeared. Lumarin is enough as a fusion material. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Lazuli》 10 シエスタ 2019/11/14 14:29 Compared to Obsidia, it's a collectible, so its uses are limited, but its strong point is that it can be activated no matter where it is sent to GY. If you use it together with Brilliant Fusion, you can treat it as a vanilla search, a feat that Obsidia cannot do. When using it in combination with Obsidia, you should be careful about scramble for the target. The business trip performance is high, and I think this card is also an excellent card to dedicate to his Gem-Knight's solitaire power. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Obsidian》 10 シエスタ 2019/11/14 14:15 You can revive all low-end vanillas, but you need to involve some kind of combo with going from your hand to his GY. Since it is a case, there is no time limit and there is no turn limit, and the original Gem-Knight has excellent elements and is ready for search, and he can easily send him to GY by Fusion. In addition to leading to further development, it also leads to securing the cost of brilliant diamonds and rubies. An excellent card that contributes to the solitaire nature of Gem-Knight. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Seraphinite》 10 シエスタ 2019/11/14 13:01 Requires gems and LIGHT and loose material designation, and there are plenty of his excellent GY activation effects such as crown and lyro in light. The effect was probably designed as a support for Dual Gem-Knight, but you can expect further developments by summoning rabbits and 《Gem-Armadillo》besides Dual. Or rather, I often use it for that purpose. The appearance of Brilliant was a turning point, and with it, it became a "Double Summon" + Hikari-only blackout, and it became possible to expect it to play an active role in various decks. As mentioned above, if you use self-regenerating materials such as crowns, you can earn big ads. A card with high combo and business trip performance. It seems that this one or Brillian will be regulated at some point. I think it has a lot of potential in the future. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Prismaura》 8 シエスタ 2019/11/14 10:17 One of Gem-Knight's most valuable removal spells. It feels even more so because 《Absorb Fusion》is a Deck that tends to limit where it can be deployed. Relatively, the evaluation of Lumarin, which can be used as a material for this card, also rises. Concerning costs, Fusion makes it easy to reduce consumption. There is also a fair amount of status. I think it's a card that should definitely be used in Gem-Knight. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Amethyst》 3 シエスタ 2019/11/14 10:05 I wonder if this is... as expected, it's a Gem turn. His stats are vanilla on low ground, the bounce effect can only interfere with sets, and the popularity of prone is declining. It's hard to get through. In the first place, I want to do this kind of effect before deployment. If you use 《Fragment Fusion》together, you can use it like an end cycle, but this is also a gem and difficult to use. If he is active, will he be on a business trip with Brilliant at Aqua Deck? Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Gem-Knight Citrine》 5 シエスタ 2019/11/14 9:53 One of the Gem-Knight fusions with looser material specifications than Rubies and Purs. His deck is good at searching and recruiting, and is fully equipped with deck fusion and non-normal fusion, so the ease of summoning will not be much different. If you use it together with Brilliant Fusion, you can send his favorite Pyro to his GY, so there is an advantage in the loose material specification itself. The effect is to suppress the effect at the time of attack, and it becomes the meta of Recruiter, Search, and Reverse that are activated at the time of battle destruction. However, the current environment is mainstream, and there are also bad points such as the offensive performance is not high due to the low RBI. It's not exactly excellent, but it's a deck that can be useful because it allows you to expand your range of tactics due to its loose material specification, and it's a deck that can easily be constrained by 《Absorb Fusion》. Good