Ferocious Flame Swordsman →Used Deck

I think that it is worthy of evaluation that it functions as insurance when Rinaldo is discounted as a flame warrior
Since his Deck uses both Warrior and other races, it can also be used as a connection to Isolde.

It's not bad, but I feel like I can't reach the itchy place.
Regarding resurrection, there is also the synchro reincarnation dragon Sansara, but compared to that, I'm glad that the damage from the suicide attack is reduced.
This one is also overwhelmingly easier to put out.
The resurrection target can be banished with Black Luster Soldier - Sacred Soldier, attacked consecutively with Kaigen, or aimed for a high RBI with Gigantech.
However, it is a pity that the bare hit point is 1300.
It hurts that the RBI up effect is also the whole field.
The evaluation is also lowered because it cannot be revived by destruction due to the effect of the card you activated.
Because you can't combo with torrent burial or black hole.
One of the links is horizontal, so points are deducted there as well.
At least 1800 RBIs, if the RBI increase was only in my field, I would have raised 8 points.
I like it.

It is a card that should be called a Link version of the Flame Swordsman, and the material specification is the same as Troymare, so it is easy to play.
The advantage is that you can add one marker to both EX and main and you can handle it even if you revive. Is it to have synergy with Souen?
Since it has two types of effects related to warriors, it is an effect that should be handled mainly by warriors, although it is loosely bound. It has a solid effect of warrior revival when not destroyed to strengthen all warriors.
However, the strengthening also extends to the opponent, and since there are many warriors with high versatility, there are many cases where the opponent is strengthened.
In addition, Warrior Link has an iron plate called Isolde, which has a high ability to add markers in the EX zone and has the effect of quickly hitting high adverts, so it's a bit bad.
The effect itself is very different, so there are situations where this card is more useful, but I don't think it has enough performance to force it into a narrow EX slot.
I would like to adopt it after considering the synergy with the looseness of the tie and the strengthening effect.

He is a Flame Swordsman who has become a Link Monster and can be played under Troymare conditions. The material is loose, but there is no merit to play other than his deck that uses Warrior, and he has Great Justice Isolde in Warrior. Even if you look at it for combat, you probably don't need to fight with about 1800 RBI. Warriors other than Link Monsters have a wide range of resurrection, but if he wants to resurrect using this guy, is there a Warrior?

The card that became the problem of the name guessing quiz with the lowest difficulty ever.
In Link 2, the material can be anything as long as the name is different, so it's pretty easy to put out.
The status is at least 1800 due to the effect of 1, and the effect of 2 will not be activated even if it is destroyed by your own effect, so basically it will be a suicide attack.
The resurrection range is Warrior and anything other than Link Monster is fine, but in general, I want to aim for a large size that can be hit considering the convenience of putting out a suicide attack.

One of the cards on which the name guessing quiz was conducted (still a sword character)
It has a material designation and a link marker on the left side like Troymare, but the effect has the characteristics of Warrior support.
Warrior reinforcement in the first half is a delicate value of 500, so there is no loss.
The effect of reviving a Warrior other than Link when this Link Summoned card in the second half is destroyed by battle and the opponent's effect does not matter the level or status, so I want to put out a large monster, but the removal of the opponent The slowness is conspicuous due to waiting and self-destruction, and if you destroy yourself in the first place, the 500 increase will disappear, so it is slightly incompatible.
Considering that the marker can only be expanded by one, I think it would be better to use Isolde as a material in his deck of Warrior and use it for offense.
Even so, recently I feel that "destroyed by battle and opponent's effect" has increased considerably, but it's probably because of Archfiend.

A flame swordsman who turned into a Link Monster. Marker biased to the left is characteristic.
It has the effect of strengthening the Warrior on the field, and the effect of reviving his GY Warrior when this Link Summoned card is destroyed in battle or by an opponent's effect.
Since he himself is also included in the enhancement target, the effective RBI is 1800. With his Warrior deck, the materials are loose and you can make full use of the enhancement, but the number 500 can't be underestimated, but it seems to be a really exquisite number that is hard to rely on.
Warrior's resurrection effect can also be used for suicide attacks, but it's undeniable that he's a large size and lacks flavor without Warrior.
The material itself is versatile, but the effect is sharp for Warrior, so it's not a card that's all that versatile. The marker also has a strong peculiarity, and it's not a bad card, but should I adopt it...? Is that the atmosphere?