Imperial Order Forbidden→Used Deck

A piece depicting a terrible king who came to deny all his spells because of his hatred of spells.
He was errataed once, but he was banned again because it still didn't work.
Now then, if you're coming back next time, why don't you make it a condition that if you have a monster on your field, you can't activate it, and if a monster appears on your field, you'll be banished?
Anyway, as it stands now, he should be building a Deck on the assumption that he won't be able to use spells from the middle, so the risk is about LP. His LP consumption is also light as a risk due to the speedup of his LP scraping speed.

A: My turn! Activating Pot of Greed, activating 《Graceful Charity》.
Activate 《Delinquent Duo》and 《The Forceful Sentry》!
Summon Magic Warrior Breaker. End the turn with a set of 2 cards!
B: My turn! Initiate seizure!
A: Then chain and activate 《Imperial Order》. Spell negate de ww
B: 1 card set. Back the monster Defense Position. turn end.
A: My turn! draw. Standby phase!
Destroy 《Imperial Order》.
B: Stop it! This isn't a duel!
It's an early mover advantage, isn't it? Even though it's forbidden even after errata,
Why is the level printed before the errata?
In the first place, Spell negate is just 700 LP, isn't it?

Continuous Trap that seals spells
In order to negate feather brooms, etc., which are originally countermeasures against Continuous Trap, it is necessary to destroy them with monster effects or traps.
A card that can be combined with 《Skill Drain》etc. to block the opponent, and the mere existence of this card spoils the gameplay of Yu-Gi-Oh.
It was errataed for a little bit and was unbanned, but it was still too powerful and was banned again, so it won't be unbanned again.

A goddamn imperial order from a king whose castle seems to be filled with 《Anti-Spell Fragrance》. Of course, it's a fucking strong card, but it unilaterally denies spells, so I feel like it's a bad existence. (Banned cards whose very existence makes the game boring)

A monster that was re-imprisoned after being released while handcuffed.
The main problem with this card is that it can even block removal methods like Feather Duster and Ryst. Therefore, in order to destroy this card, you basically need to use a monster, but for example, if you want to remove it with the general-purpose link Troymare Phoenix, you need to cut 3 cards from your hand.
It's ridiculous enough to spend so much of your hand for one card, so there's no other way to ban it. Occasionally there are people who defend it, but 100% of people use it.

There are a lot of his decks that destroy backs with spell cards, so even though it is a continuous trap card, it may be the reason why it was banned because it can crush those countermeasure cards.
I laughed at the addition of a shadow-like production in Master Duel. No, it's not a card you can laugh about.

That's strong. Fake searches and draws in Spell, how deterrent is Spell Solitaire? I'm aware that this may prevent you from going first, but because of this, there's a demand for his quick Spell Trap removal, which is inferior in terms of number of kills and cost. The banning of this feels a sense of unfairness at the time of Goyo Errata.

An unprecedented card that was errataed and banned again. After all, the banned card No. 1 is strange. It is ironic that Sambol, the #1 banned card in the same period, became semi-restricted at the same time.
The fundamental problem was that he relied on spell cards to remove feather brooms, cyclones, and spell traps, and forbidding them entirely added to the strength of this card. Pancra is the only countermeasure, and if Pancra is supplemented with other suppression, it will be difficult to destroy. It was also bad that it was only used to cover it after it was extensively deployed. What did you mean by negate each other?
I can't seem to get back from the ban anymore.

I was officially banned and thought I was back from the ban, but the official banned it again. It seals the card, and since it's a Continuous Trap, when the opponent's Spell is activated, it can be chained and this guy can negate the activation.

Did you think you could beat me with that level of errata?

Without Pankratops, it would be impossible to suppress Skidre's Imperial Order...
It's been allowed as a deterrent because the spell is strong, but once it's banned it probably won't come back.

Cards that were errataed and still not allowed

The power of the royal palace in the Yu-Gi-Oh world is tremendous.
If it is set up first, there are many things that can't be helped, and the LP cost can be doubled.

A tyrant who finally died abroad.
There are countless countries that have been crushed, such as magic cities, great powers, and theaters of teaching. Kind of like Emperor Monarch from FF2.
Before the errata of the 2nd term, the LP cost was only self-standby, and the maintenance was optional, and it was a performance that laughed at "Magic Jammer" and "Magic Drain", and it was regulated in less than two months, but at the end of the 9th term. errata forced maintenance and effectively doubled the cost.
However, in a speeded-up Duel, such a problem is nothing more than a minor problem, and since the blocking ability of this card remains unchanged, I have to say that I fundamentally misjudged where to put it.
Even if the LP cost is doubled at 1400 every turn, it would still be a strong card. Or rather, it's strange that the LP cost is cheaper than "Mirror Wall" even after errata...
For a while after his return, he survived on the pretext of rescuing the environmentally declining Trap Deck,
Recently, it has also been adopted in deployment systems, and after suppressing it in the preceding deployment, it does the act of laying down and not letting the opponent do anything on the return turn, and it seems that the threshold is about to be exceeded... impression.
……As a result of being used like this and going wild outside of metabi, it was Royal Oppression that was banned, so honestly I can't help but feel that it's unreasonable to extend my life just for the sake of saving the Trap Deck. .
In decks that can't be helped unless you can shoot spells such as fusion themes and ritual themes, "Vanity's Emptiness" and this card are too scary, so "Twin Twisters" and Cosmic Cyclone, which can be chained to this card and crushed, are prioritized over feather brooms. There will be many.
It seems that all his spells activated on the field will be negate, and unlike Skidre, even if he sends the activated spell card to GY at the cost of a drop, he can't escape negate, so it's even more so.
If it's a defense against Feather Broom or Lyst, there are replacements such as Lord of the Heavenly Prison, so I wonder if it's about time for me to retire peacefully.
However, banning this card is synonymous with admitting that the errata was naive, so even though it is hated, it is a card that seems to survive somehow in the future due to various circumstances.

A veteran fighter who has continued to carry the leading meta card sign since the dawn of time.
Being a companion to 《Royal Decree》, his ability to negate his spells, which has a more immediate effect, is much stronger than that of Trap, and is the only probation punishment while the errata release group is gaining freedom one after another. The judgment was factually correct and he was re-imprisoned. Accomplished the first two-class conquest in Yugi history.
I wonder if I'll be able to print a card with this card toy illustration soon.

Even this is a crazy fact that the text after errata

A meta card king that boasts the strongest class locking performance with only a modest LP cost. Although it is a card from a long time ago, it is a level where you should always be vigilant against his deck, which has a strong metabi element in the environment. It's a restricted card, but for some reason he's held to death when facing Eldlich or Alter. When you open this card with an illustration of a king with a downward expression under the blue sky, you will not only break out in a cold sweat, but also feel despair.

Comprehensive evaluation: A threatening card that blocks the opponent's spell.
By activating a chain, it is possible to block the opponent's spells at no cost, and although there is an LP cost, it is possible to continue blocking his spells for multiple turns.
Aim for strong suppression by blocking initial moves such as searches and preventing removal to yourself to some extent.
The LP cost, which is a difficult point, is also light, and it is easy to suppress if you use ants and monster effects together.
If you draw it first, it will show full power, but even if you don't, it will have a big impact, so it's a card that you want to deal with quickly.

One of the cards that won't let you play Yu-Gi-Oh!
There are a lot of decks with spells as key cards, and given the theme of fusions and rituals, it's pretty ugly.
Don't overestimate it because it can be easily removed by Troymare Phoenix, but it's still a brutal card.
After all, it's a trap, so people tend to say it's slow

A card that always has to be considered and its countermeasures when constructing his Yu-Gi-Oh deck.
It's such a powerful effect that it simply shuts out his spell.
However, there are surprisingly many weaknesses, such as being unable to use his spells, removal by monster effects, Galaxy Cyclone that can be activated by GY, and being chained with Cyclone or 《Twin Twisters》against the activation of this card will destroy it.
Also, if you have just 700 LP remaining, you may lose the battle if you can't deal with it before the next standby phase, so it can't be said to be an absolute existence.

The royal palace was weakened by errata, but was banned again, and died twice.
Permanently he negates spells, and the adoption rate for draw-to-use spells is still high, giving him a strong impact in many decks.
Prior to the errata, he was voluntary to pay the LP cost, which was too easy to handle for the effect, so he was errataed to make it mandatory to pay and maintain.
However, it was still within the practical range, and the fundamental strength was deferred.
If you take the initiative and come with this guy to the place where you have laid down a suppressive formation, it will hardly be a game anymore.
It can be said to be oppression and nothingness, but in this game where monsters and spells tend to be the core, it's no good to easily and permanently seal his Special Summon and spells...

A card that completely metas spells. You have to pay 700 LP each turn as a cost, but I think it's too light considering the balance with the effect. Once activated, it is very difficult to remove as Cyclone and his Harpie's Feather Broom are unusable. What does it mean to be so strong with errata?

This strength even if errataed
Restricted even with errata

When I looked at the card list, I was surprised to see that the ban on this card had been lifted, but it was errata.
It seems that the LP cost is paid every turn and the self-destruction effect can no longer be used.
We weakened it, but it's a power card that's 3-5 times stronger than a normal card, so the limit seems reasonable.

Still very strong despite errata.
As for the fact that arbitrary cancellation is not possible, it is easy to remove him from the field with TRUE, his Eldlich, anger knuckles, star marks, etc.
The maintenance cost has doubled and the game speeds up, so I don't mind that much.
If it's before castration, it's definitely more than 10 points.

For Trap Beat, it's a super powerful card that can greatly restrict the opponent's actions while countering Feather Broom, but his deck that can be used is a little limited because of its too strong influence.
Also, LP will decrease at a fairly fast speed, so if the rotation is too slow, you will be in a disadvantageous situation. Emergency food is a good match because you can return LP while canceling this card.
Personally, I have the impression that a poor deck is a card that discards something important to compete with his latest deck.

I'll start with a personal story, but even though I know it's an unfulfillable wish that could even go back to being a banned card, I can't help but want to put 3 cards in my deck. It's a Continuous Trap.
In addition to having to pay LP back and forth, it was errataed so that it could not be destroyed at his own will, so it returned from a prohibited card to a restricted card, but the effect itself did not deteriorate at all and stopped his spell card. The strength as a card is the best among all cards.
If he stops the spell with a sentence or warning, in most cases it will allow the activation of the favorite with a significantly reduced LP, but in this case it is a Continuous Trap that can be stopped continuously. Very rarely.
If you can't make up for the ad gap, this card is very useful for slow decks.
In addition, it is a powerful card that is easier to handle in Decks with self-bounce elements and Decks that contain cards that effectively destroy this card.
Due to the presence of this card and Kaori, there are more than a few Duelists who use Tsuitsui and Kozusai, which can be chained even from the second attack and hit from above, as the main or side cards, rather than Nagisa and Light. Even though it is a scarce trap card that can only be put in one copy, it is a card that has a great impact on Deck construction.
It was designated as a banned card overseas in 2022, and since this led to large-scale errata, it was the first "card that was re-designated as a banned card after returning from being banned to being restricted due to errata". It has become
Expand Deck and Trap Deck, a card that feels like a card that makes you realize the depth of the sensory gap caused by the Deck you're holding, just like the feelings I have for Tomb, Murder, Hahaha Righteous Twitsui Reboot, and so on. However, since it is a regular on the side, I am always nervous about when it will be designated as a banned card in Japan.
When that time comes, I have no choice but to rely on Kaori quietly.
In particular, the very existence of a card that affects the win rate just by drawing it with a limited card without search means is only an upside factor. So is drawing a card and a void at the same time.
Postscript for April 2022 revision: Ahhh! ! ! My decree! ! ! Thank you for everything! ! !
That's why it was designated as a banned card, but as I mentioned earlier, this is something I was prepared for.
Even if it's a Continuous Trap, which is difficult to search for, or is already a limited card, the end of the upside card that ruins the game's existence itself will be like this.
Finally, even in Japan, "cards that were re-imprisoned even though they were errata and returned to restrictions" have come out.
Re-imprisonment errata cards like Wickry have existed in the past, but this is the first time since they began to be reinstated from bans due to large-scale errata in recent years.
Well... I thought I should graduate from the permanent meta trap with this as a macro or samorimi! Gassho!

An old spell meta that also used revolvers. Due to the errata, the cost has to be paid on each player's turn, but the effect hasn't changed. The errata set is still a limitation.

If you chain it like the popular "as an activation effect processing", you can use it like a real Spell negate trap for the first time.

A Continuous Trap card that negates spell effects. It is rare in Yu-Gi-Oh, even if it is errata, it is specified as a restriction, so I realize how powerful it is to negate the spell effect. It feels like Ritual and Fusion are almost completely sealed with this one card.

It's been almost a year and a half since the errata. Even though the maintenance cost has increased, the fact that he is still not lifted from the restriction shows that the power of Spell negate is still strong.

He can no longer self-destruct at will, and the maintenance cost has doubled, but he still has the power to completely block the Deck, which uses Spells as his lifeline. The errata will be as difficult to mitigate as the ring of destruction among the winners.

Compared to before the errata, it's a lot less user-friendly, and since it negates the effect, there is a subtle loophole in that it can be activated and the GY effect is possible, but there are decks that can be quite devastating with just this one. It's probably a lot, and I have the impression that it won't be easily alleviated compared to other errata sets.

Even though it can no longer self-destruct, the card still has terrible performance.
Spell Bind is still too strong

This strength that can be understood by using
Until my working days were strange
Originally, it's fine to feel like this
Adoption of the prone destruction system Trap is low now,
It stings a lot.
The usual pattern of unlimited
Probably not.

Can be canceled at will → I'll leave it until I get a competent spell from him in my hand. It's atrocious
Even if it can no longer be canceled at will, it can be removed by monster effects and trap effects, so Spell negate is still a strong and useful card.
LP700 payment is better than LP800 payment or LP500 payment. Because when you can afford it, you die in maintenance costs

Friend: "Looks like the game is ending, my girlfriend's Spell Deck...
Can I beat you! ? This is the end of my turn! ”
Me: "Damn! It's my turn! Draw!
I put one card face down and end my turn! ! ”
Friend: "Fuhahahaha! Minor fish! My turn! Spell Card Blaho!
Activate! I'll empty your monsters! ”
I " Imperial Order activated!"
Friend「・・・(ﾟДﾟ)」
(true story)
Spell Edition 《Royal Decree》
Various errata contents such as destruction selection disappearing.
that? Strong, huh?

A Continuous Trap that negates spells.
Even though the errata forced his LP cost, it still hits most of his decks.

A Spell negate card that's even more troublesome than fragrance.

Former Banned Card. Spell version 《Royal Decree》.
Before the errata, it was a phony card that only cost you standby, and you could choose whether or not to maintain it with cost denial at any time.
Konami's recent errata has returned to limits.
However, among the returning group, this is the card that has not reflected the most.
With the sweet adjustment that the control power is left unchanged just because the cost is forced on each other's turn, it immediately returns to the serious environment.
Similarly, he does not negate spells up to the scale of the P zone unlike restraint magic sealing, but the strength to bind is one of the best performances in the royal palace series.
With TRUE, you can release it and release it at will, so you can demonstrate power that is almost the same as how you used it in the past.
A card that could be banned again.

Let's negate the "Spell" which is the basic concept in Yu-Gi-Oh! ! Now you won't be afraid of feather brooms or obstacles! ! When the turn comes back, get rid of it with Drancia, which is currently on sale in packs, or her upcoming TRUE Emperor release! !
I can't even laugh anymore...

Huh, strong?
no no no no no no no
After half a year, it's definitely going to be unlimited

As a card that allows the side with the advantage to keep the board even after being errataed, it is as strong as Vanity's Emptiness
The same goes for barriers, but for some reason fusion and rituals have been hit hard lately

There are loopholes such as cards that fundamentally deny the element of spells, which are the second most important thing in Yu-Gi-Oh after monsters, and Galasai's GY effect. Unless you do something about it, the spell will be on paper forever.
It costs 700 LP on both turns, which is by no means a light cost, but in this day and age where it's mainstream to block the opponent with the first attack and push it out as it is, it's definitely a card that wins who hits first. A card that is harmless to you and turns into a vicious card in your Deck.
By the way, it was even worse before the errata because it immediately self-destructed, but it was errataed, but there's no point in releasing it even if it's errata, since the essential part of "denying all spell cards" hasn't changed.

Although I have to pay the maintenance cost, I think it's powerful to be able to block her spell cards other than GY activation.

Due to the errata, it became incapable of self-destruction and was eased, but the suppression force has not changed. strong
Where you want to divide on your own turn
Let's destroy it with Drancia, no, it's easier to step on the deck...
\\ true dragon //
Okay Konmai, the mystery is solved!

I wonder where Konmai wants to take the Yu-Gi-Oh OCG... (distant eyes).
Just when I thought I'd put out a bunch of broken Spell cards like hangars and bureaus to bring the environment to life, it's time to return. I do not understand the meaning. Please forgive me for the first attack and blockage game.

Arguably the biggest errata of all time. Please revert to banning uninteresting cards that only narrow the game.

In the past, he was free to decide whether to self-destruct or keep it by paying 700 during his standby phase, so he was put in a forbidden prison for a whopping 12 years counting from March 2004 due to its heinous performance. .
It's a comeback with an unexpected errata this time!
Now that we have to pay 700 LP for each other's standbys, we've lost more flexibility than before, but there's no reason why Spell negate is weaker.
Of course, if you are exactly 700, you will be forced to pay LP and lose, so be careful.
In the current environment, there are so many destructive methods, so unless there is a serious reason, they won't strangle themselves (I'm not saying there's no such thing).
To destroy it yourself, deal with Scrap Dragon, Drancia, and Quick-Play Spell emergency food that can cost him GY and restore LP.
… There will be more means of preemptive suppression! You did it! I don't know why, you idiot
Is this going to be banned again?

The reason why this card continues to be banned is because, unlike the description, it can self-destruct at any time, and because it has the effect of neutralizing all spells that have a wide variety of uses, as well as its cruelty. One of those nightmares is coming back with errata.
The contents of the errata are the forced payment of the cost and the actual self-destruction seal. Of course, the opponent will not be able to use his spells properly until his LP runs out, so it depends on the situation if it is not his deck that has a voluntary release method or his deck that hardly uses his spells. may strangle themselves. But Zodiac has a card called Drancia...
At this timing, one of the most brutal cards among the currently banned cards has returned to restrictions. His self-destruction is gone, but his Spell negate is still alive, so I have a bad feeling about it... Now, what is the impact on the environment?

A card that only sees a second ban despite being errataed and coming back. Lead Drancia, stance of imperial order, opponent dies. The LP cost was forced, and it was possible to pay it during the opponent's standby phase, but the part that suppresses spells has not changed at all. Of course, compared to before, there are a lot more ways to break through, but if you can't chain removal to activating a decree, his deck, which is mainly fusion and ritual, will be completely useless. The 700 payment part is also exquisite, and the calculation that LP remains even after paying 11 times. Shouldn't they at least pay 800?

A trap card that will be banned to seal his evil Spell and will be returned by errata (?) from 2017/1
Forced LP cost payment and arbitrary self-destruction became impossible, but no touch on sealing
Since Tsuitsui and Feather are powerless, you can destroy them by using a monster effect (Drancia, etc.), Trap, or GY activation.
If there is no other breakthrough, it will return in the worst possible way, which may further accelerate the preemptive control of the deadlock.
Even if I come back with half-finished errata, I'll just be in trouble...

Plain and simple, Spell Never Forgive Man.
There are many cards that are removed by monster effects, but when it comes to destroying Spell/Trap, he will be more likely to favor Spell cards. A villainous card that destroys one of the opponent's strategies while erasing them. Moreover, it comes with a convenient function that self-destructs without paying the cost. In the current environment where Pendulums are increasing and his powerful Spell Cards are increasing, he will never be released. Not in the future.

Absolutely no Spell Man for him.
Although the LP cost is necessary, he is not afraid of spells as long as he can activate this.
Moreover, it is a good thing that can be canceled at your own will.
The only opponents that this can't hit are Fulmon and Paleozoic, who are full of traps (spells are only life-saving), and won't come back from the ban.

This is prohibited. I don't like suppression.

Super brutal performance that will crush the Pendulum if the limit is restored now

All the spell cards will rot~~

Once successfully activated, even a cycle cannot break it.

A card like the incarnation of the first absolute advantage
It's not that he's fatal except for decks that use spell cards as the main axis, but for reasons related to the core of the game that if this card exists, you have to raise the level of other meta cards. one of the banned cards
It is said that one pattern of behavior can be destroyed at a cost that is too cheap. If you want to use his spell, let him self-destruct.

A vicious Continuous Trap at an incomprehensible level.
If you don't pay the cost, it self-destructs, but the cost is only 700, and if it gets in the way, you can self-destruct and use his spells as much as you want, so it's only a merit.
It's a card that promotes the first attack control game, so it's unlikely to be canceled.
I thought... but the errata was canceled.
Even so, I thought that there would be some adjustments that were quite difficult to use, but the pace of paying LP was doubled, and the point that it was no longer possible to cancel it at will.
Currently, most of the initial moves and removal behind him rely on spells, so he wants to go first and do whatever he wants. I can see something like that happening.
I wonder if this level of errata is okay...
His spells have a great influence in this game, so it's possible that the side that used it too easily would end up with his Kaiju destroying the board and making it impossible to come back...

In the anime, Shocker combines his Deck Master abilities with
The cruelty of sealing both of his opponent's Spell Traps remains in my impression.
Even in the real world, even in an era where monster effects are rampant, it's a cruelty that shouldn't be revived.

A card that suppresses spells. The maintenance cost is not light, but thanks to the maintenance cost, you can unlock it at your own will, so it's actually a plus. A card that can be banned normally because its influence is not odd.

Since there is no Deck in the East or the West that does not use Spells (except for Fulmon), it is natural that it will have a great impact.
Furthermore, the obvious effect that it can be disposable is naturally powerful.
I want to use it when I see a deck that uses some spells in the environment.

A card that negates the effects of spell cards.
Compared to Royal Decree, which negates the effect of the Trap card, there is a maintenance cost, but the big difference is that it can be canceled at any time.
Spell cards have a higher adoption rate than trap cards, and are banned cards because they can seal all powerful cards and can be released at will.
Of course, you can think that there is no limit return.

They call sin something small fish...
A card that will be strengthened as long as the card proliferates.
Prohibition is commonplace.

A Continuous Trap that negates the effects of her opponent's spell cards. There is a maintenance cost that pays 700 points.
Before the errata, this card was obviously bad because it could be unlocked at will.
It's the same with 《Messenger of Peace》and 《Mirror Wall》, but by being able to unlock it whenever you want, you can avoid overstepping the cost and avoiding any disadvantages to yourself.
Even without that, his spell-sealing, which has many power cards, is a more brutal element than it says.
It was a card that was banned immediately after the ban was enacted, but even such a card will be revived on the stage of Shaba for the first time in 13 years by prying open Amanoiwato. The only errata I received was his forced LP payment and the accompanying ban on self-destruction. If you use the monster's effect destruction, you may be able to use his Spell Bind yourself.
The fact that it is still limited while eating errata is proof of its excessive power and the small amount of errata damage.

A card that can deal with his spell card, which has an immediate effect, even though it has a maintenance cost.
Contrary to the notice, there is no such thing as face-down removal, and there are many sources of one-kill among spell cards, so
Even with maintenance costs, it's too powerful, so there's a chance it'll come back from banning...

Don't give out banned cards with SR! w
i don't know if i should be happy

A card that is powerful even if it is downgraded and cannot be used because of the ban.
Should I be happy or sad if I win...

Heinous...
One of the cards that should never be unbanned.
However, it appears that the ban will now be lifted.
It's been errataed for the time being, but isn't this level of weakening still too strong...?