Number C1: Numeron Chaos Gate Sunya →Used Deck

Comprehensive evaluation: It is possible to attack with all removal + burn, but I would like to compensate for the point that it tends to be defenseless when connecting from 《Numeron Calling》.
Overlapped with 《No.1 Gate of Numeron – Ekam》, aiming for removal and the next burn.
However, since you can't put out any other monsters from 《Numeron Calling》, you can't attack even if you remove it, and you tend to give your opponent a chance to attack.
I want a defensive method, and since Numeron Calling only removes 3 "Gates of Numeron", it's only 3000.
It's not going to kill you on turn 1, so it's best to finish off after dealing damage, or if you can eliminate the opponent's Xyz Monster.
It may also be possible to Special Summon No. 1 with 《Chain Summon》and remove it repeatedly to eliminate it as a whole.
If you use 《Number 99: Utopia Dragonar》to Special Summon during your opponent's turn, it will be treated as an Xyz Summon, so you can use banishment, so it might be a good idea to aim for that.

X material is heavy, so I think it would be better to borrow the power of 《Numeron Calling》.
I think it's excellent that (1) excluding all monsters leads to a burn effect if 《Numeron Network》exists in addition to self-regeneration.
Due to the restrictions of 《Numeron Calling》, if you play this card in Main Phase 1, you won't be able to follow up afterward, so I think it's best to play it in Main Phase 2 after attacking.
If you play this card with 《Numeron Calling》, the burn effect of (2) will do 3000 damage, which is also a strength.

It's a card that will be the boss of Numeron, but the threat of his deck is...
The X summoning condition that is superimposed on Ekam, the effect of excluding all monsters on the field when the X summoning is successful, and if you are excluded, return during the next standby phase, and if there is "Numeron Network", the excluded X monster's Has the effect of dealing damage equal to his total ATK.
A card with high resistance destruction ability because it can be dealt with by excluding monsters without targeting them. It also banishes itself, but it returns to the next self standby and gives a huge burn damage. It's a card that's likely to be evaluated differently depending on how it handles the fairly long lag of the next self-standby phase.
If you summon Ekam and his delightful companions with 《Numeron Calling》, stack this card on Ekam and banish them all, you can aim for 4000 burns on the next turn, but if you succeed directly, you can't help but feel like you can launch a variety of attacks.

Level 2 is 4 bodies and the weight of the material peculiar to CNo., but there is no effect that requires a specific card for the material, so the effect can be used even if it is bare.
Still, considering the time and effort, it seems almost impossible to use this method.
It is a card that can be used on top of Echam, which is played almost directly, and has a powerful removal effect that removes all monsters when Xyz Summoning is successful.
However, your field will be empty, so if you don't think about how to extend your life, you may be killed on the next turn.
During your next Standby Phase, if you use the Burn effect when returning directly, you can enter 3000, and depending on the opponent, you can hit the damage of the one-kill class, so the firepower is not underestimated.
Although it is assumed that the network remains in place properly.

Although there is no material specification, it is very heavy because 4 bodies are required. Basically, the stacking summons from Ekam are the main ones.
It has a very high removal power, as it banishes all monsters when X-summoned.
Furthermore, it will return at the time of its next standby, and if the conditions are met, it will give Burn. Depending on the situation and the opponent, it will be the end of the game.
However, total exclusion has an effect here as well. In particular, he is easy to summon with Numeron, but due to the direct effect, it is difficult to develop the follow-up, so I am afraid of the return.
Regarding the burn effect, there is a high possibility that the network will be destroyed by the time it comes back, so honestly I can't expect much.
Also, from the next turn onwards, if the game cannot be decided or processed, there is a possibility that it will be a network infringement.
The writing is strong, but I think it's a card that is difficult to handle.
His other decks are more likely to show their true value than Numeron.

Destroy all order and descend into chaotic darkness. Lead the world to its true form. Gate of Chaos Numeron - Sinyunya!
Basically, the main thing is to aim for burn 3000 on top of "NO.
Personally, I felt that it would be interesting to use this card's 2nd effect as its main focus. Since it is possible to remove and return without any restrictions, I feel that it would be possible to create an interesting Deck using something like "Macro Cosmos".

It's a rank 2 card that can be produced with 4 level 2 monsters, but it's a card that seems to use Ekam as a material.
① is an effect that banishes all monsters on the field at the time of X summoning. It's a fairly powerful removal that eliminates all, but it may be difficult to get a kill immediately after using it because it indiscriminately eliminates opponents including yourself.
② Special Summons this that has been excluded during standby, and if the Numeron network is in play, damage equal to the sum of her ATK of X that has been excluded.
Directly from the Numeron network, if you use Numeron Acam as a material and then use ①, it is possible to burn out 3000 damage with high firepower burn, and after the second time, things that have already been excluded Since it is in a certain state, the amount of damage per time will be disgusting.
As a point of caution, if you put it out in ②, it will remain in the field, so you will not be able to make a direct move from the Numeron network for the second time. It would be nice if there was a way to actively move them away from the field, but if they don't split their resources, taking advantage of the fact that ② is optional, they didn't return on purpose the first time, and returned the second time. You have options. In that case, what is excluded is at least "1000 x 6 + 2000 = 8000" and it will be exactly one kill.