Goblin Out of the Frying Pan →Used Deck

Cards that are often said to be useless as a stopgap
When I was talking to high school boys on the train earlier about how to use them, I couldn't help but think about it.
It would be nice to be able to negate Spells that can only be activated once per turn and 《Pot of Desires》, 《Magical Stone Excavation》and 《Left Arm Offering》that require heavy costs. I think it is.
On the other hand, it is effective against decks with many spells like [Sky Striker Ace] and his spells without turn 1.
Come to think of it, when I was using [Sky Striker Ace], a similar 《Blizzard》was issued from the side. And it also supports 《Sky Striker Mecha Modules - Multirole》… Huh? Blizzard if not mirror? !
But this is Counter Trap for the time being, and it has an advantage over there...
And since he uses Spells and Speed Spells, which need to consume Speed Counters in Riding Duels in games such as WCS, there may be opportunities for him to play an active role there.
I would like to think that there is not a single card that is useless.

I think it should be rated higher...
It's really a stopgap against spells that don't have a turn 1, but I think it's pretty strong if it has a turn 1 or a high cost.

(Re-evaluation due to increased opportunities to fight environmental decks)
Strong against environmental decks, weak against fan decks.
It's not uncommon for all of the spells that are used in a theme that's been pampered by environment-class KONAMI to pour in new cards, with the exception of 《Raigeki》, 《Harpie's Feather Duster》and 《Monster Reborn》. Against such decks, it often works well as a one-turn stopping effect.
However, it's a serious problem that you can't stop the second turnover cards such as 《Raigeki》《Harpie's Feather Duster》, so avoid using it for monsters that do not have destruction resistance or decks that rely on backing for the board as much as possible. sea ​​bream.
There are many cases where it doesn't work against themes that are still fighting with old spells outside the environment, so it's not uncommon that it doesn't hit at all.
Most of all, if you use it against Charge of the Light Brigade, which is often used by Ishizu-types, you'll end up in a lot of trouble with the main effect, GY Fertilizer. I can't escape the evaluation of "It's Magic Jammer after all". A deck that can't withstand the LP cost of God Trap, the hand cost of Magic Jammer, and can pass through Raigeki, so there's room for consideration. be.

A counter trap that returns his countered spells to the owner's hand.
Of course, your opponent can still use his spell card when he returns.
If you can clear the restrictions on the number of times, it will be reactivated immediately.
There are cards with the same concept in MTG, but there is a "mana cost" over there, so the opponent's hand stops.
It would be a problem if an OCG that doesn't have anything like that (in other words, monsters play the role of mana) brings it.
If you could at least put it back on the Deck, I could have destroyed the time.

Comprehensive evaluation: In addition to shifting timing, a combo is possible by making one's card negate.
If you negate a card like Pot of Desires that has a large amount of cost removal, you will have to worry about whether or not your opponent will use it again.
Although it can be used, the range of tactics is narrowed.
It may be possible to negate 《Crossout Designator》to ensure safety in the chain block, and there may be some uses.
Also, just like Malfunction, you can negate your Spell card and combo with a card that triggers a Counter Trap.
This can negate his The Sanctuary in the Sky related spell card and use it as a trigger.
It is true that it is better to negate the opponent's card.

Counter Trap negates one of my favorite spells, and it only costs a little LP and doesn't reduce your hand.
If you activate it against the opponent's Normal Spell during the opponent's turn, it's just a stopgap, just like its name suggests. It's surprisingly effective against things like Erasure Sukego.
That being said, if you use this card, it would be better to use Magic Jammer.

A card that can't be surpassed for its name.
Although it is unique compared to its counterpart malfunction, it is still difficult to use due to its low versatility.
Is it currently impossible to give priority to jammers that can be negate and destroyed as they are?

It's good for cards with a cost to activate, but it's too restrictive.

Malfunction spell version
At the very least, I wanted a card power that would not activate a card with the same name during that turn.
The problem is that it will be activated again when the spell card is returned to the hand, but since many of his recent spell cards are activated after paying the cost, there is a way to use it rather than malfunctioning. I will give this rating.

Despite its name, it's a card that can't be helped at all. Even if the spell is returned, it will be activated again immediately. It's possible to make you pay the cost again or prevent a quick spell on your turn, though. I wanted you to at least return the malfunction to your hand.

Hey, get out of there
2 points because it would be delicious if the effect activation of a card with a cost could be negate
Feeding Tsuitsui at the Exchange, or increasing the chain bulk of the Odd-Eyes Gravity Dragon...
hard

Even if you pay 500 LP to return his spell card to your opponent's hand, it will only be used again.
Moreover, it doesn't support [Trap Card] soberly (Eh

If the opponent doesn't use the cost, he's a card that only loses add, and he's limited to spells...
As a stopgap, he should have been slapped with no use that turn.

It's a pity that the card name has "survive on the spot", but the effect can be activated immediately from the hand.
Countering on your opponent's turn is completely pointless, so if you use it, it's only when his Quick-Play Spell comes flying on your turn...?
Personally, I think it's a little better than a malfunction because there are few rivals with a difference of 50 steps, yeah.

A malfunction that was supposed to be better than this card completely lost its value due to Wiretap
I don't know if there is one here...
At the very least, I think it would have been better if the card could not be used during that turn.

Hello. I'm a quibbler.
A card based on a combo with Exchange.
Hand over his spell card to your opponent, set this card in that state with a casual face, and use this card according to the opponent's activation.
This card consumes an exchange and this card, but if you get one card from your opponent and minus 1, your opponent will steal one card from your hand and minus 1, so it's refreshing if the combo goes well.
teeth? 《Gift Exchange》? "There's no such thing as wickedness. If you're a man, you should exchange!"
Cyclone cards are recommended. It's highly versatile, and since this card is face down, there's a high chance that your opponent will use it.
This area is skillfully handed over to the opponent, and it becomes a psychological warfare on top of that.
If your opponent doesn't use the card with caution, that's it. It's a uniquely interesting card, so I don't think it can be used in tournaments, but I'd like you to try using it in a free duel.

Just returning it to your hand doesn't work as a stopgap.
Just use another card...

It's not even a makeshift. If you can use it on her spells that have a cost such as discarding your hand or releasing a monster when activated, you can make a little profit, but the chances of such things being used are very small. In other words, there are very few opportunities for this to be used.

Counter Trap is really just a stopgap.
For those that can be activated at no cost, they can be activated again
It's not even a makeshift.

It's terrible to return a good card that consumes 1 card for 500 LP. It is also used because he is a spell. "I wish I could at least use it for monster effects." "A bribe would be easier to use and more powerful."

Just like the name suggests, it's a stupid card that can only be used on the spot.
It's quite a story card.

Since it returns to the hand, his Quick-Play Spell that was activated during his turn is temporarily sealed. However, it doesn't work as a stopgap during your opponent's turn, so 《Magic Jammer》would be much better.

I pretended to be overcoming the situation, but I wasn't overcoming it...
It doesn't make sense if it's used again even if you put it back.
Although it requires a hand cost, there is a card called Magic Jammer that can be dealt with without fail...
And the goblin's hard life continues.

meaningless card.
If you return it to your hand... it doesn't make sense

Like countering spells with an activation cost.
Like stopping a set Quick-Play Spell.

Even if the spell card is returned, it will not be used again...
If it's against a card that has a cost, it's fine, but otherwise there's no point in using it.
He's got some value in stopping Quick-Play Spells when he's set, but he only earns a tempo ad.
《Twin Twisters》, which has a cost and can be set often, 《Left Arm Offering》, which requires a huge cost to activate, and Greedy, may work a little. No, really just a little bit...

500 LP is wasted except for combos such as 《Mind Crush》and combos such as 《Card Destruction》that return his Quick-Play Spell activated on the turn of the player who can activate this card to the hand. Since the activation itself is negate, his LP cost will also be returned.

In most cases, the cost is 500 LP < 1 hand card, but if it's still reused, I wonder if I'll throw away my hand...
Speaking of trauma when this guy appeared in the rare frame of EE4 many times...

The punchline is that it will be activated again even if you survive the spot.
I'm not outdone!

If a spell card returns to your hand, it will be used again.
It's better to use a card that can be properly destroyed.

(1) Pay 500LP to activate. Destroy this card.
This effect in a nutshell.

Pay 500 LP to activate. Your opponent pays the cost of his spell card and returns it to his hand without activating it. The turn you activated this card, your opponent can activate that card again.