Blizzard →Used Deck

It's hard not to be able to interfere with traps that have a high binding power, and it's useless with effects that don't activate or damages. Even if it is a countermeasure against Quick-Play Spells such as the designated person in the second attack, there are many scenes where it does the same job even if you put his general Spell Trap removal in this frame.
However, the same guy is useful against opponents who use a lot of spells, and there are multiple facedowns, and there are removals that make this one stronger, so it is a candidate for the side depending on the environment.

A valuable card that allows you to negate your opponent's Normal Spell, Quick-Play Spell, and Ritual Spell by the effect of Quick-Play Spell, regardless of the nature of the effect.
Those cards will not be sent to GY and will be returned to the opponent's hand, but the effects of the returned cards and the Spell cards with the same name will be negate for that turn, so it is called Turn 1. Even if it is activated against a spell card that does not exist, it will not be reactivated during that turn, and you can postpone the deployment using that spell.
Also, if those cards are not originally sent to GY under the application of Macro Cosmos, etc., they will not be returned to the opponent's hand and will follow the rules created by those card effects, and in the case of macros, they will be excluded as they are. will be
Its range is limited to spells only, and even for spell cards, effects that do not activate Continuous Spells and Equip Spells, Quick-Play Spells activated by damage tests, and effects activated by GY cannot be negates, so you can use them recklessly. It's a card with a strong habit that only gives you a disadvantage, but if you get it right, it can be used not only for defense but also for offense.

A nice card to have when you need it.
In fact, when Urara Masu G hits a grave or an erasure, I smile when I have it at hand.
As mentioned in other comments, being able to neutralize a card with the same name, even if it's limited to that turn, gives me a sense of security and makes me even happier.
I think it would be pretty tough if one type of summoner, his Sky Striker Ace, or his deck that adopted multiple spells with the same name were used.

Localized blizzard. Is it a genealogy of Cyclone and Twister?
It is activated on her Spell card of the opponent's face-up, and has the effect of negating the effect of the card itself and the same name card on the field, and the effect of returning to the hand instead of GY if the card is sent to her GY. .
The text is a little complicated, but basically a Quick-Play Spell card that stops his Spell card from activating. Countermeasures against 《Called by the Grave》・《Crossout Designator》are probably the main focus. Since the 2nd and subsequent cards with the same name are sealed together, you can safely throw a hand trigger during the turn. It also works effectively against his Deck, which uses a lot of spell cards with the same name.
I feel like the virtual enemy is a little narrow, but cards that step on the meta of this kind of meta may also appear in the environment.

A card that is not a Counter Trap, but can be operated like a no-cost magic jammer.
Furthermore, even if a card with the same name is activated, its effect will be negate during that turn, and there is also a part that goes beyond that, even if the Continuous Spell that has already been activated is partially effective.
However, if the target card is sent to GY, it will return to the hand, allowing it to be reactivated on the next turn.
In other words, it's a good story if you don't give the next turn, so it seems that the main operation will be as a finisher for the first attack.
A card that feels like something close to Red Reboot in a way.

It is possible to negate the effect of his opponent's spell card, and it can be chained not only to Continuous Spell but also to Normal Spell and Quick-Play Spell. However, since it will be sent to his GY except for Continuous Spells, it will basically return to your hand, so there is a risk that it will be reused. Conversely, note that continuous spells do not negate permanent effects. Although it works very usefully against opponents who mainly use spells, it basically does not leave the frame of side personnel.