HOME　＞　Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lists　＞　Cybernetic Horizon　＞　Restoration Point Guard

Restoration Point Guard →Used Deck

Card Kind

Attribute

Level

Type

ATK

DEF

Link Monster
Effect Monster

Cyberse

1000

2 Cyberse monsters
Once per turn, if another Link Monster is Link Summoned: This card cannot be destroyed by battle or card effects for the rest of this turn. If a Link Monster, that was Link Summoned using this card as material, is destroyed by an opponent's card effect, while this card is in the GY (except during the Damage Step): You can Special Summon this card. You can only use this effect of "Restoration Point Guard" once per turn.


	LINK - 2

password：74163487

Average Rating Score

2.4(8)

Card Info
Card Reviews (8 rating scores)
Decks with Restoration Point Guard (1 Decks)
Card Category and Effect Category
Products in Japan
Ranking and View Num

"Restoration Point Guard" card reviews and rating scores

2.4(8)

		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		37%	（3）
		62%	（5）

みめっと
2023/05/29 12:50

Among his many Cyberse Link 2 monsters, it has the most mysterious ability, and its evaluation is also at the bottom level.
Even if you look at all Link 2 monsters, I think it's next to Linkerbell or even worse, and isn't it seriously the weakest card for his Link Monster in Cyberse?
As you can see from the stats and effect text, there isn't a single thing written that is spectacularly strong, and at least both L materials don't feel worthy of being tied to Cyberse.
By using this card as an L material, it is possible to revive from GY when the monster is destroyed by the opponent's effect, as if it possessed the Link Monster that came out. If you use L materials, you can switch bodies as long as the number of EX Decks allows, but if you don't want to give up the frame of the EX Deck for that, you can use the same Link 2 Cybers to give the monsters you used as L materials resistance to effect destruction. I feel like it would be better to use 《I:P Masquerena》.

Good ( 4 )

シエスタ
2020/02/20 14:49

Summoning would be easy in Cyberse. The marker is only added in one place, but it can be used in the main and EX.
It has destruction resistance, but it exposes 1000 hit points with a link that can't be used as a defense, and in the first place, it's recommended to be a material due to the effect of 2, so it feels like a bonus and it's hard to say it's very useful.
It also has a self-regenerating effect, but since it activates GY, it is easy to deal with because it has low surprise attacks and abundant removal other than destruction.
It has subtle and poorly meshed performance, and it will not be able to take a seat in the highly competitive Cybers EX.

Good

カンベイ
2019/08/04 10:32

① grants destruction resistance in the turn when the link summon is successful. I would like to say that there is no loss in granting resistance to destruction, but it only lasts until the end of the turn, and it can be a double-edged sword for this card, which is his Link Monster with low stats. I can tell you the effect. In the first place, the same Link 2 monster has a permanent effect of destruction resistance by default, and there is Cyberse Wicckid that can also grant destruction resistance to the linked monster, and if you look only at this effect, this The very existence of the card is questionable.
The effect of ② is a revival effect. It sounds convenient, but if a Link Monster that used this card as a link material is destroyed by an opponent's effect, the conditions are troublesome, and in the end, this doesn't work more than a struggle if the Link Monster is destroyed. yeah. It would be nice if you could use this effect to activate ①, but it would be difficult to do so during the opponent's turn.

Good

備長炭18
2018/07/08 13:30

Others can use Link Monsters to give themselves resistance, but with only ATK and only 1000 RBIs, it's more of a punching bag than a wall.
Also, even if you revive with the passive condition of destroying the opponent's effect, the instability is conspicuous, and if you think about the possibility of putting it out on the opponent's turn, I don't think it has a very high recovery performance.
It has a marker that can be used even if it is in the extra main monster zone, but with this effect it is too uncertain whether the time will come when the left marker can be used.
On top of that, it's tied to two Cybers, so I can't help but give a harsh evaluation.

Good

ヒコモン
2018/05/10 12:51

The performance is not good considering that Cyberse monster is specified as material. It's nice to get resistance, but other than this card, he has a condition that it will be activated when a Link Monster is successfully Link Summoned, and the status is low. If the opponent link summons him, he can become a wall, but in that case he will continue to expose his ATK 1000. The effect of ② allows him to revive when it becomes a link material, but as long as it's public information, there's no way he'll destroy the Link Monster's effect without thinking about it.

Good

とき
2018/04/14 10:37

A Cyber-S Link Monster with a left-side marker.
When a Link Monster other than this card is Link Summoned, it gains resistance to destruction, and when a Link Monster Link Summoned using this card as material is destroyed by effect, it has the effect of reviving this card.
However, the effect is passive and cannot contribute to further development. The 1st effect can only protect this card, and the 2nd effect does not gain resistance, and this card with low ability tends to be destroyed in battle as it is.
It lacks the ability to secure adverts and contribute to development, which is required for Link 2, and its markers are also quite difficult to use, so I think it will end up being a very unusable card.

Good

はわわ
2018/03/24 3:37

If you go through when issuing links 3 to 4, it will be revived when the effect is destroyed
However, since it is defeated immediately at this stage, it is subtle as a check against removal.
Also, even if he could activate the effect of (1), he would be turned into a punching bag and his LP could be greatly reduced.
The negative point is that the effects of (1) and (2) are both dependent on the other party.

Good

京太
2024/06/17 22:55