Breaker the Dark Magical Warrior →Used Deck

A higher version of Breaker, but bigger doesn't mean better.
Each summoning method has a different number of counters installed, and it's not difficult to build for any summoning. Unlike the breaker, there is no upper limit to the number of counters that can be equipped, so if you specialize it, you can aim for a tremendous RBI.
However, the essential removal effect is limited to 1 turn, and it seems to be deteriorating rather than growing.
If you want to remove demons and traps, you can of course use a lower version of the breaker, and because it is lower, the accident rate is lower. There is also a Mobius that can destroy two cards as an advanced level.
Even in the P Deck, I am not P, and Eccentric Archfiend is a P with a scale of 7, and can remove magic and traps without summoning, and can even destroy monsters if I put it on the field.
However, taking advantage of its advanced points, it can be used as a countermeasure against sending cards in the P Deck, and it can also be used to break metas such as imperial orders. If you have the deployment power of P Deck, such treatment is not difficult and can be treated as a powerful advanced level.
There are a lot of rivals at the advanced level, which is highly prone to accidents, so I honestly feel it's a bit harsh, but I would like to find the significance of adopting it by taking advantage of the upper limit of counters that can be equipped with P summons and the fact that it is an advanced level.

Magic Warrior Breaker has returned as an advanced level. In addition to accumulating a lot of counters, he can reach 2800 points with Pendulum Summon. However, since it is a high-level accident agent and can only be destroyed in turn 1 after all, Mobius, which can destroy 2 cards, is better, right? Disposal even said. For the time being, in addition to the summoning right, it also needs release personnel, so it is possible to differentiate it, but there is little merit to include this card that becomes an accident personnel in his current Pendulum theme.

Now, let alone Magician, unrestricted scale 78 is commonplace, so you can use 2800 hits or 3 removals

It's just an Effect Monster, so I don't really know what it wants to do with the Pendulum.
Well, since he's level 6, he's relatively easy to get even with a Pendulum, and the 2800 RBI that comes out easily isn't weak, so what? cannot perform more than

While his Performapal Performage, which is the main introduction of the Magic Warrior Breaker for magic sealing countermeasures, etc., is increasing, it is a card that is slowly starting to play an active role in Performapal Performage, where it is very easy to prepare for his Tribute of P summoning and Tribute Summon.
If you read each text separately, it may not seem very strong, but if you write "Once per turn, a high-to-medium RBI monster that can use Cyclone with no hand cost," it might look quite strong. ?
In the current environment where the Pendulum Deck is all the rage, it becomes a very troublesome existence for opponents who break the P zone every turn.
It's already been used in his deck by the winner of a modest-sized tournament, and has produced results, so it seems highly likely that the evaluation will be reviewed in the future.

top breaker. 2400 if summoned, 2800 if p-summoned, making it easy to destroy in battle even if it's large.
However, if it's purely for the purpose of destructive effect, the previous breaker is easier to use, so it's a bit subtle...

It seems that the rule that the evolution card of a strong card becomes Sosu is still present even in the new series.
Strengthening with (1) and (2) itself is not particularly problematic in introducing a new system,
The strength of the original breaker is that it is easy to remove prone and has a reasonable RBI, so it is absurd to seek bigness there.
(3) has a large increase, and although (4) limits the removal of prone before evolution, it can still be used.
Even so, the return is low despite the oddly high risk, and the problem is that there isn't much of a taste to go out of your way to P-summon this card.
For the time being, the rising value is higher than Marionette.

Overall, it's an evaluation that it's weak, but it's relatively useful with Iloilo's support.
At level 6, his ATK is 1600 or less, so he can be searched with 《Chaos End》Master. It might be good to be able to use them together
Also, since it is level 6 and has magic counters, it works well with 《Tempest Magician》. Depending on the situation, it might be better to Xyz and play Tremis M7 and collect it into your hand to aim for a P Summon.

can i use it? A subtle place if you ask me
Now I have no choice but to pray that this card will be transformed by P summoning

What is this? Special Summon does not counter and cannot be used once per turn. Moreover, the picture is messy and lame.

Even if it is used normally, the strength of the breaker is that it can hit a cyclone at a lower class, so I wonder if it would lose its lightness.
Even with spellcasting support, Special Summon only supports his Pendulum...
That's why it used to be a bad evaluation, but in the current environment where the stability of Pendulum Summon has improved, it is a piece that can be re-evaluated.
A wide range of Pendulum Decks such as Magician, EM Odd-Eyes and Metalfoes have been born, and this card's high Spell Trap destruction performance is very useful when looking at Pendulum.
It's not a P-monster, so it's painful to use it up, but if you can prove that you have the ability to incorporate it into a P-summoning Deck, it may have the potential to become popular.

It may have been made as a card that can be used to Pendulum Summon, but with this performance, it can't be said that it's subtle. If you can use the destruction effect many times... Even if you say it, Pendulum Summon or not, it will only deteriorate Ice Monarch Mobius (in the sense of 2400 RBI for destroying one Spell Trap).
It might be interesting to try it in his deck, which actively uses magic counters.
It pales in comparison to the Magic Warrior Breaker, which used to be a banned card. If you want to use Spell Trap destruction monsters, you're better off using them.

2400 by summoning.
2800 with P summon.
If you think about it normally, you should want to use the effect that destroys Spell Trap once before attacking, so minus 400 is no problem.
If you think about it that way, when summoned, roughly speaking, it's less than Ice Monarch Moebius.
I'm tempted to think that if it's a P-summon, but I don't think this card would be a candidate for a P-summon with a wide range.
Depending on the opponent, there is also the possibility of being fed to Ragnazero...

If you don't P-summon, it's easy to be backward compatible with "Ice Monarch Moebius", and because of the limit on the number of times even pre-evolved "Breaker" can play a role, so P-summoning is almost essential. . Also, even if you go to the trouble of P-summoning, if you activate the effect once and leave the field, there is not much point in using it, so you need a card to protect it. It's a little tricky to see how well it works in the current environment.