HOME　＞　Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lists　＞　STARTER DECK(2013)　＞　Swords of Burning Light

Swords of Burning Light →Used Deck

Card Kind	Attribute	Level	Type	ATK	DEF

Continuous Spell	-	-	-	-	-
While you control no monsters, monsters your opponent controls cannot declare attacks. If you control a monster, or if your opponent has 5 or more cards in their hand, destroy this card.
password：93087299
Average Rating Score		1.8(16)

Card Info
Card Reviews (16 rating scores)
Decks with Swords of Burning Light (4 Decks)
Card Category and Effect Category
Products in Japan
Ranking and View Num

"Swords of Burning Light" card reviews and rating scores

1.8(16)

		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		6%	（1）
		93%	（15）

みめっと
2022/09/21 18:48

A "Protection Sword" Spell Card that does not break automatically over time, but breaks immediately under certain conditions.
It was the third card in the series following Light and Darkness. It's not hard to imagine being invited.

Good ( 1 )

ブルーバード
2022/09/21 16:45

If it is only the first half, there is no reason why it can not be used for rockburn. However, it cannot be used in advance due to the second half condition. This is the culprit of everything.
I would like this disadvantage to be added to the imperial decree or 《Vanity's Emptiness》.

Good ( 1 )

ヒコモン
2020/07/21 12:15

If 《Swords of Revealing Light》came out when it was a restricted card, I wouldn't be able to understand it, but I don't understand why it came out after it became unlimited. Unlike over there, there is a possibility that it will remain for more than 3 turns, but the reason Swords of Revealing Light was lifted is because it became easily removed, and the fact that it can be maintained for a long time is also a subtle advantage. I didn't want the self-destruct effect when the opponent had 5 or more cards in hand.

Good ( 1 )

シエスタ
2018/11/07 17:19

Despite its name, it can be said to be a subspecies of 《Swords of Revealing Light》... but it self-destructs under various loose conditions, so it can be said that it is almost degraded.
In any case, it is dependent on the opponent, and it is almost non-functional in the early game and when you are dominant.
If you take advantage of the fact that it is easy to self-destruct, there will be no use for it.
Considering Zexal's style, I wonder if the meaning that came out only for the homage of the first generation is stronger.

Good ( 1 )

アルバ
2018/11/06 22:45

If you have a monster, it will self-destruct.
If the self-destruction condition is not met, there is a possibility that it will last longer than the shielding sword, but considering that it does not last even 3 turns against the shielding sword, it is not a big advantage.
I thought it was an adjusted version of the shielding sword that was once limited, but I don't understand the reason why it was created after the shielding sword was made unlimited.

Good

はわわ
2018/11/06 18:36

Vulnerable to removal and self-destruct
It would be better to adopt another lock card honestly

Good

備長炭18
2018/03/30 19:04

The self-destruct effect is pretty harsh, and it would be easier to use 《Swords of Revealing Light》without any peculiarities.

Good

サンダー・ボルト
2013/03/21 6:38

Regardless of the effect, I think that the self-destruct condition is very strict and it is too difficult to handle. Unlike 《Swords of Revealing Light》, it is a Continuous Spell, so it can support Z-ONE, etc., but there are cards that are easy to handle, such as 《Messenger of Peace》and level limit B area, even for Continuous Spell lock cards... .

Good

NEOS
2013/03/17 21:32

Compared to Light, 《Swords of Concealing Light》, it has the feature of remaining on the field until it is destroyed.
Therefore, if the opponent (and yourself) do nothing, it can remain forever.
I have a hunch that it will be dealt with before that...
I think 《Swords of Concealing Light》is still working for me...
Also, I was expecting a red flame... well, let's not touch it...

Good

スクラップトリトドン
2013/03/16 9:47

In order to protect from attacks, you can't put monsters on the field and you have to scrape your opponent's hand.
I can manage to rely on my own field, but if there is a self-destructive effect of the other party's dependence, I can't protect it and it's tough.
…Even better, 《Swords of Revealing Light》.

Good

とき
2013/02/22 15:11

The smell of fire he clings and he chokes
Here is an account with severe restrictions instead of making 《Swords of Revealing Light》permanent.
It's pretty hard to blow away just by putting out a monster. Faders and 《Zero Gardna》are also used in Countdown, so compatibility with this card is subtle.
Trap says that there are other powerful and stable lock cards such as the original 《Swords of Revealing Light》, 《Messenger of Peace》and 《Red Screen》.
There is nothing you can do about destroying the cards mentioned above, and this card is a rock card Votoms with the additional shackles of being out if you accumulate your hand.

Good

みかんゼリー
2013/02/22 2:01

I don't think the stamina was the reason why was eased unlimitedly...
On top of being dependent on the opponent you can't see, there are strict restrictions such as not being able to place monsters on the field, and if it's destroyed, it's possible to be directly directed at once, making it difficult to use.
A stable Swords of Revealing Light would be fine.

Good

SOUL
2013/02/22 0:13

It's a new lock card, but even if the self-destruct condition in the first half can be used without any effect depending on the type of deck he has, the second half is a plain pain.
If you're going to stiffen up with a lock, it's natural for the opponent's hand to accumulate, and you'll be able to easily achieve 5 cards in your hand.
I wonder if it would be more stable to use another lock card.

Good ( 1 )

セラ
2013/02/21 21:09

《Swords of Revealing Light》

Good

ファイア野郎
2013/02/21 21:00

A card that blocks the attack of an opponent's monster.
However, this can not put out monsters,
I think the conditions for self-destruction are quite strict, such as depending on the other party...
It would be better to simply use "Swords of Revealing Light".

Good ( 1 )

ねこーら
2024/04/24 9:15