Colosseum - Cage of the Gladiator Beasts →Used Deck

A field for the Gladiator Beast.
The biggest drawback of this card is its low rate of increase. It goes without saying that a mere 100 per counter is too modest even when it first appeared. I think there should be at least 200...
The counter itself is rather narrow in OCG, but unlike when it first appeared, the chances of monsters from the deck being his Special Summon are increasing, so the speed at which the counter rides is surprisingly not ridiculous.
Also, the fact that the rise value is low means that the opponent does not see it as a threat, and it can be said that it has a pseudo resistance. If a card like this bothers you with a removal resource, it's not small by itself.
Furthermore, it has the effect of gaining resistance to destruction by costing a card with the same name, so it's not that bad. Also, this card firmly belongs to the Gladiator Beast category, so you can use various Gladiator Beast supports, and it also supports field searches. It can withstand destruction up to twice in a row, but it is strong enough to withstand continuous destruction.
This card with slowly counters on it should be an exquisitely disgusting card from the opponent's point of view. And if there are about 3 counters, you can expect an unexpected effect. This card is an all-enhancement, so having 5 or more is enough. If it's more than that, it's worth aggressively defending that card. In that case, the destruction negate effect with the same name card as the cost will also work.
It's by no means a strong card, and at first glance it's a weak card, but it's not something you throw away.

The first Field Spell distributed to the OCG original theme of the 5th period has generally poor performance, but this of Gladiator Beast is no exception.
Aside from strengthening the whole in line with the movement of the theme, it features mystery resistance that is unparalleled as a Field Spell that avoids destruction by discarding the same name card from the hand.
Despite its low performance, it imposes an unreasonable demand that it must be stacked in multiples in order to demonstrate its maximum power.

Comprehensive evaluation: It is easier to develop 《Gladiator Beast Vespasius》.
With Gladiator Beast, he can efficiently earn counters because he deploys from the deck, but after 5 times, it's as slow as Gladiator Beast Vespasius.
It's not a bad idea to have the Recruiter attack continuously with self-destructs, but the damage tends to be severe.
Regarding resistance, you can make use of it by collecting cards with the same name around 《Gladiator Beast Equeste》, but is it better to reuse cards like 《Gladiator Beast United》?

"As has already been said, this is one of the cards that is quite peculiar."
Modern Yu-Gi-Oh has a lot of Decks that do Special Summons... but if you look closely, it must be Special Summons from Decks. The 《Gladiator Beast》series is easy to accumulate, but even so, 100 up per one is too inefficient. For example, if it was around 200, it would have attracted attention, but it is too low. Another effect protects it from destruction by discarding another card from your hand. It costs a lot of money to need another card just to protect it. If it's stronger, I'll try to prevent it, but when I think about whether it's worth defending against this guy, I doubt it. A really disappointing card.
Edit: I did it again... Really sorry. ↓

Magnification of only 100 is too shabby. I thought it had destruction resistance, but I discarded the second card and kept it...

The Coliseum is supposed to be an important place in the setting of Gladiator Beast.
But the important effect is shabby.
It's nice that the counter generation trigger isn't limited to your own or his Gladiator Beast, but even so, the enhancement rate is low.
It has destruction resistance so that it is easy to maintain, but it is a prerequisite to adopt multiple cards that require the same name card in your hand. It's hard to assume multiple copies with this level of effect.
Unfortunately, I have to say that this is an underpowered card, as there are plenty of battle aids that are easier to use.

It can't be helped because it's a Field Spell of this era, but the increase value is too low

It is a Field Spell dedicated to Gladiator Beast, but it is difficult to adopt because the conditions for placing a counter and the increase value due to it are all plain words. The removal effect would have been much more appreciated than the combat support...

Field Spell for Gladiator Beast.
Is it a strength that even Raquel and Equite can do light battles with 3 or 4 counters?
However, it seems that it will be removed before the counter accumulates.
If it's called a cage, I wonder if it could have been a little more sturdy.

A card that raises his ATK from his Gladiator Beast, which emphasizes combat, and doesn't waste counters.
It sounds good when you say that it has a high destruction resistance, but it is not easy to use because the counter is quite irresistible, and the destruction resistance assuming multiple stacks is inconvenient.
It also hurts that it can't coexist with the powerful ancient forest.
I don't care, but was there such a simple counter in the early days?

Sure, he wants a Gladiator Beast for combat support, but it's hard to use at this speed.
Gladiator Beast sometimes puts Alive and 《Onslaught of the Fire Kings》, so he can get a counter even if he doesn't let Gladiator Beast fight, but even so, it's a quicker and larger combat support. is what you want to do.

No, Gladiator Beast's combat support is nice, but... there's a more versatile card with this, isn't it?

picture? what is this card?
When you say Gladiator Beast's Field Spell, it's the old forest, right? (half laugh)

I tried stacking it, but I pulled it out right away

Gladiator Beast's combat assistance is nice, but isn't this painful?
If you accumulate counters for such a long time, a cyclone will fly...
Also, the destruction resistance is slightly difficult to use, and it can only be used up to 2 times...

3 counters will be placed in the expansion of Kaikyoku Mormorat (trembling voice
I'm happy that swordfights compensate for combat, but the compensation is too poor.
It seems better to lower his opponent's ATK with Burden of the Mighty, which is versatile even though it doesn't work against X.
The speed at which the counter rides is not great, and there is something that is unreliable to compensate for his low ATK in swordfighting.
As for the effect destruction resistance, the situation where this condition is met is accidental and not delicious, and it is not reliable.
Unless he's a big Gladiator Beast fan, there's little need to use this card...

Gladiator Beast exclusive field card.
It's subtle because it takes quite a while to get on the counter.
Although it has destruction resistance, the effect conditions are strict.