Stall Turn →Used Deck

If it was a counter that wasn't a counter against a counter, I could have easily adopted it (maybe)
Meta against meta can't be meta unless the opponent uses it, so naturally it shouldn't be stable.
In that case, I'll put in a card that can be countered normally, right?
To put it bluntly, you don't have to use it because it doesn't make sense, but if it was a Counter Trap instead of a counter counter, it would have been reasonable to remove 3 top cost cards from the back side of the Deck.
Mr. Konmai

"Counter Counter" written in a complicated way.
However, if you look closely, the monsters are only for those who negate the summoning act, and the itchy cousin is out of reach.
I can't help but say that the reliability as a counter is subtle.
I would also like to pair with cards that refer to the number of cards removed.
I have the impression that this is a card for experts who may shine depending on the environment.

Card
The negate range itself isn't that bad, so it might have been stronger if you could shoot from your hand like Red Reboot.

Depending on the deck, the cost is almost negligible, but negate against negate is a bad thing.
In addition to the instability that it doesn't work unless the opponent takes action, it can't do anything against monster effects, so it's hard to function as a return card.
It's a card that feels good when it's decided, but it's hard to use and seems to be more disgusting than bad.

One before Norare Trap Frame No. 80, which has become an annual regular pack, this time's general-purpose Trap Frame No. 79 is a counter-counter-like Counter Trap.
In response to the activation of negate-type cards in the same range as the negate of the sentence, it is activated by excluding 3 cards from the top of the deck face down, and it is also a useful removal effect that makes it negate and bounces the deck.
Of course, what I want to aim for is against negate effects that are activated by monsters that exist in the field. And I would like to appreciate the point that a lifeline for rebooting can be prepared in addition to the declaration.
However, effects that negate the activation of this monster effect, such as notifications, and negates due to the activation of Spell Trap effects that already exist face-up on the field cannot be captured, and sadly, "counter counter expert It's weak and not worthy of being used." I don't think this card is missing the absolute principle of Yu-Gi-Oh! I have the impression that there are fewer scenes than I thought.
As mentioned above, the activation cost itself is light, so it's true that you'll feel really bad if you hit it with a sentence.

Comprehensive evaluation: Although it is a high-ranking card of 《Smashing Horn》, it is only a Counter Trap with a narrow range.
It's a counter to cards that negate monster summons, Special Summons and Spells, and trap cards.
However, it cannot counter cards that negate monster effects, and it has no ability to counter other cards, such as destroying effects.
The cost is almost nothing, but it's subtle as a counter to suppression.