"Artifact Ignition" Rating Score by 瑠璃

Assuming it wasn't the user.
If you still have one more face-down Artifact in addition to the newly set Artifact that was used, you should play assuming that the Artifact that was set during that turn will come up. If there are no monsters on the opponent's field, Malevolent Catastrophe can be considered, and Raikou can be considered for face-down defense. Other than that, Cyclone, Double Cyclone, Movement, etc., there are many other ways that can be destroyed. Artifact's maximum defense is 2500, so I thought it would be fine to hit it with a pearl, but since it has no resistance, if the set monster is Moralta or the other face down is Mirafo, there's nothing I can do about it. If it's a Pleiades or someone with resistance like Tilas...but if it's an escape...etc. There are many conflicts. Tilas is probably safe.
However, monsters that are set by movement can be confirmed when they are selected, so you can take countermeasures just by thinking about how to move to some extent at that time. However, if you're in the Battle Phase, you can't deal with it, so it's safer to remove it before it deploys as much as possible, with the intention of getting an Artifact. Even if the second effect of this card activates and you can't enter the Battle Phase, it's better than having Moralta destroy the monsters that are taking great pains, so I wonder if there's an end cycle even after this card appears. It is also important that if Artifact can be end cycled, it cannot come out.
…Isn't it a safe countermeasure to hit the lower class that can disappear and solidify with the main 2 instead of aiming for 1 kill? As to Artifact as a whole. Hit with 《Safe Zone》. Hit with a lead blow. Such.
really annoying.
Will it slow down as intended?
… I feel like I can’t escape the restrictions.