"Armed Neos" Rating Score by ごまくま

An ornamental card from Emo. that's all.
Seriously speaking, this is a card that made Judai and Manjoume fans very disappointed. In the Neos axis [E・HERO], the Armed Dragon has no synergy and is only a cause of accidents, and the existence of Neos is the same in [Armed Dragon]. Since there is no name of "E・HERO", it is not applicable to most of HERO's excellent support.
The usefulness of the effect is also extremely low, and the total removal when the fusion summon is successful is a roundabout thing left behind in the era of referring to the level of his Dragon monster in his own GY, and of course Xyz Link Monsters that do not have levels cannot be destroyed. . Since it cannot be activated without a Dragon in GY, it also has the worst compatibility with Favorite Contact, which returns Armed Dragon, which was used as a fusion power material, to his Deck, making it even more difficult to use.
Above all, 《Rainbow Neos》, which appeared long before this card, can bounce all of the opponent's monsters' Decks without any questions under looser conditions than this card. It is almost completely upward compatible with high, and there is no value in adopting it for the removal effect.
The effect of releasing itself and ignoring the condition of the E・HERO Fusion Monster and Special Summoning when the second battle is successfully destroyed is too late to go through the battle, and the above-mentioned total removal It doesn't match the effect at all. Worst of all is the deadly bad compatibility with 《Neos Fusion》, which is a prerequisite for putting out this card due to the weight of fusion materials and lack of synergy. Neos Fusion has a very heavy restriction that "after activation, he cannot special summon monsters until the end of the turn", so this second effect cannot be used during that turn, making it difficult to use. is very bad.
In general, this card has an overwhelming number of voices of disappointment and disappointment, such as "Why did this happen?" and "Rainbow Neos is fine."