"Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon" Rating Score by ねおんちゃん

Returns
A very high-level monster as an ace, purely as a suppression monster.
Strong resistance to negate anything, single destruction, and high stats. It has a very complete performance all in one.
Nonetheless, this ability itself is an effect that only throws a blockage once, and it is not enough to clog the opponent, and it is not powerful enough to be banned as a card that stands alone on the field.
And "Red-Eyes Fusion", a Red-Eyes exclusive deck fusion card, carries a very heavy disadvantage at the level of clear malice that "forbids all other summons and Special Summons during the turn you use this card". Therefore, if you were to obediently fusion summon with Red-Eyes Fusion, you would have been forced to "stand alone on the field".
It can only interfere once in the opponent's turn, and in terms of its single-unit interference and suppression performance, it's actually not much different from 《Baronne de Fleur》. It's self-evident that in a modern Yu-Gi-Oh game, having just one Baroness standing on the board is pointless.
In fact, this very powerful and self-contained ability is intentionally intended to somehow rescue weak cards that are disrespectful to all waste, if you call it a useless industrial waste of less than shit like "Red-Eyes Fusion". I guess it was adjusted on the route to make everything. In fact, it was at a level where it was reasonable to look at it as a card to save 《Red-Eyes Fusion》, and maybe even this was still too far for the 11th season environmental deck.
However, due to the presence of his Predaplant Verte Anaconda, which overcomes the disadvantages of 《Red-Eyes Fusion》and realizes his deck fusion, "Ace of hope to save the weak theme" is "a crazy business trip part that stands calmly next to the fucking strong environmental theme". has transformed into
As you can see from the fact that Baroness, which has the performance of a "slightly weaker version of Dragoon", is rampant as an accessory to the control board, it can easily come out from anywhere even if it is a performance that is not safe to stand alone in the field. If you can stand on the field, it's a problem. If it came out as a real Link 2 monster because of Anaconda, there was no way to defend it, and unfortunately this card was also sent to the banned card list.
However, with the banning of this card, the Red-Eyes Deck has really lost a single meaningful card to fusion summon with 《Red-Eyes Fusion》, and the fusion axis has completely lost its raison d'etre. Because none of his other Red-Eyes Fusion Monsters have resistance or interference, they perform dramatically poorly making it basically impossible to survive the opponent's turn. Still, it would have been nice if it had enough firepower to cut through the damage in one turn under the restriction that it couldn't be deployed, but honestly speaking, it's too weak for a monster to use alone in terms of offense, or rather, it's just small fries.
Many people have been traumatized by summoning using Anaconda, and there are many voices calling for a permanent ban on this card. Since I will continue to carry it on my back, I would like to see the ban lifted by adding the sentence "This card can be Special Summoned from the EX Deck only by the effect of Red-Eyes Fusion". I assure you, that alone can weaken it to a level that will never allow it to enter the environment.
I mean, all anacondas are bad. Because of Anaconda, ``The worst compatibility with Dragoon is the Red-Eyes Deck, which should bear its name.'' In order to do so), a distorted state was born, so in the end, Red-Eyes would not have been saved even for a moment. Also, "Red-Eyes Fusion", which boasts an abnormal weakness and is disrespectful to garbage, is also bad, saying that it's a level of garbage that can't be saved unless you print such an abnormal card.
This is all the resentment of Red-Eyes users.