"Shore Knight" Rating Score by 戦士族大好き

Speaking of WATER, it's a battle position change!
I don't think so, but ah ah ah! ! ! ! !
It's one of the few cards that angered Konami.
There are two major problems with this card.
One is an effect trigger.
If you use the effect on your own, you have to pass the turn to your opponent with ATK 1400 standing. Flip Summon is also NG.
Also, he has almost no synergy between WATER and battle position change as far as I know.
When it comes to changing the battle position, 《Level Limit - Area B》and 《Stumbling》come to mind, but if you ask me if it synergizes with WATER, it's just a general-purpose card.
《Eisbahn》is one of the few cards related to WATER, but it is subtle because it does not affect the battle position change of this card.
In this regard, Altitude Knight is better than Shore Knight in that WIND has plenty of bounce and can share triggers with cards like Divine Wind of Mist Valley.
Why did you choose the battle position even though there were many candidates for triggers that make you imagine WATER, such as hand death (spiritual dolphin), hand cost (kind virus, etc.), Spell Trap destruction (Monarch), etc.? Anger wells up.
The second is that this card is his WATER charge in the Knight series.
Never again will there be his WATER in the Knights series. It is irreversible.
It is one of the few WATER GY fertilizers in Warrior, and it can be barely evaluated that the effect can be used with zero dependence on the other party. Two points to consider.
As a consideration of this battle position change, did you want to express the ebb and flow of the tide with the battle position? Or did you want to express that you came to the beach (attack) and looked at the sea like the illustration (defense)?