"ZERO-MAX" Rating Score by guest

・Since there is no name restriction on IF new (this is an old card), even if multiple cards come, it will not spoil and the risk of accidents is low.
・If you go first, there is no BP in the first place, so the cost is not a cost,
In the first place, IF can't move if it's interrupted, so it's almost a wake when it's attacked later.
・ Archfiend resurrection misses the timing and involves allies, so it is out of the question,
Even if you clean up less than 2700 with general revival from the second attack, there are currently many cards that work with destruction triggers and cards that are not effective in the first place, so you shouldn't rely on it as a removal card.
*By the way, due to the text "His ATK of the ssed monster has 'lower (less than) ATK' (omitted below)", Mirage (0 offense and defense) will not be removed by reviving Necromancer (0 offense and defense). .
From the above point of view, I have some doubts about the current evaluation.
Personally, I see it as the initial move after dropping Necromancer etc. in the early stages. Since it's a spell, it doesn't rot in your hand, and if Necromancer is in his GY, you can use it, so compared to people like 《Into the Void》and Grepher, who are only a hindrance if they come in other than the first move, there is an accidental risk of drawing or duplicating cards. is overwhelmingly low.
Abandoning BP is a pain if you attack second, but there are cases where you can't completely crush your opponent with an IF that assumes the first move, and I think it's even better to abandon BP rather than bring it to BP with a poor RBI of IF. .