"Infernal Flame Emperor" Rating Score by みめっと

It is one of the signboard monsters of the early days of the new structure deck based on the theme of races and attributes that are not character strucks, and it is a monster with a card name that I thought of in about 10 seconds.
The estimated breakdown is 3 seconds for Hell Flame, and after that, I thought about whether to use King, Beast, or Manticore, and as a result, I settled for 7 seconds for Emperor.
Many of the Struk signboard monsters at this time are so-called Special Summon monsters that cannot be Normal Summoned and can only be put into play when special conditions such as sacrificing a specific monster are met, which is of course difficult. , In the case of this card, Normal Summon is possible, but Special Summon is not. It's closed.
On top of that, the NS effect only works when you Tribute Summon, and there are no other monster effects, so if you take it easy in a tomb, it just becomes an effect monster with no effect.
The effect is to smash up to 5 Spell Traps by excluding GY's FIRE monsters. It doesn't take advantage of the characteristics of Pyro or FIRE, and you have to destroy the number of cards you remove, so if the number of Spell Trap in the field becomes less than that, it will be a minimum. A transcendence disappointing specification that is not flexible.
The RBI is about 2700, so isn't it okay to at least let the monsters touch the removal effect?
If "Royal Firestorm Guards" serves "Fire Monarch" refers to this monster, then the anti-synergy is extreme.
There are probably a few people who were attracted to the illustration of an unknown monster burning in red, and it was completely useless in terms of performance, and adults who were students at the time are now nostalgic. I think it's a disappointing monster that no one remembers.
Currently, even if it is recorded as a normal card in the non-theme frame of the regular pack, I think it is at a level that can be a reverse MVP.