"Accesscode Talker" Rating Score by 奇怪賊

Link 4 is originally heavy, but it's easier than I thought because the material is loosely bound. There are many routes that go through Harry and one card from Formad Skipper, etc., and it literally has a wealth of access methods.
It's not a basic attack-first control type, but a monster that can be used as a finisher from the second turn onwards. Everyone must have killed or been killed by this guy many times.
Due to its effect, it is easy to accumulate Link Monsters with multiple attributes in GY, and I would like to use it in "Cyberse", which uses a compatible transcode and 《Update Jammer》, but due to the loose material restrictions, I chose Link 2 or higher. I often go on business trips to the Deck.
Even with his Deck, which makes extras such as Exodia the cost of strong money, it is possible to beat multiple removals with a scapegoat.
That said, it also has weaknesses, and is not good at destruction resistance because it is necessary to pass attacks through destruction, and Astram, which uses Mascarena as a material, can be said to be a natural enemy. I don't see it much these days, but it's also vulnerable to being able to stop the finish with 《Kuriphoton》or 《Battle Fader》. It can't be chained by effects, but it's powerless against free chains, and it can be taken advantage of by destroying the field and being shot by a phantom. It is also vulnerable to the Timelord, who cannot be destroyed and does not deal any battle damage, and if Rafion is sent in return, 5300 Burns will attack in return.
But is it okay to have such weaknesses? If it's a super strong monster with no weaknesses, it will be banned. like a dragoon.