HOME　＞　Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Lists　＞　EXTRA PACK Volume 2　＞　Rai-Jin

Rai-Jin →Used Deck

Card Kind	Attribute	Level	Type	ATK	DEF

Effect Monster	-	4	Thunder	?	1000
All LIGHT monsters you control gain 100 ATK for each LIGHT monster in your Graveyard. During your End Phase, destroy 1 LIGHT monster you control. There can only be 1 face-up "Rai-Jin" on the field.
password：37829468
Average Rating Score		1.1(16)

Card Info
Card Reviews (16 rating scores)
Decks with Rai-Jin (5 Decks)
Card Category and Effect Category
Products in Japan
Ranking and View Num

"Rai-Jin" card reviews and rating scores

1.1(16)

		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		0%	（0）
		100%	（16）

みめっと
2023/06/12 9:40

A low-level Thunder monster born overseas that is not "Rai-Mei".
She is characterized by a strange costume like an American comic hero who can use lightning, and she may have a buddy relationship with her.
You can strengthen all of her LIGHT monsters on your field in proportion to the number of LIGHT monsters in her GY, but the enhancement ratio is too low and you can't stack monsters with the same name, so you can't stack them. ATK? Since it's a 0 start, the card itself doesn't have a good power, and the means to put it on the field is limited.
However, it has the disadvantage of blowing up one of his LIGHT monsters in the field, including himself, during each of his end phases, and if this is an ability set to increase the enhancement value by sending his LIGHT monsters to his GY. If so, I can only say that it is a big help.
It's a pitiful monster that came to Japan as soon as it appeared, or rather, it was judged to be unbearable to use from the moment the information came out overseas.

Good ( 1 )

ねこーら
2023/04/09 17:26

Comprehensive evaluation: It is difficult to handle because the magnification is low and multiple deployment is not possible.
LIGHT is 500 with 5 cards, and it is more effective to use around 《Luminous Spark》.
Also, if you can strengthen 3 or less, using 《Chaos Necromancer》will increase your overall ATK.
Since you can only have one copy, it's also difficult to use in that you can't use Inferno Reckless Summon to deploy a monster with the same name and aim for stacking.
End phase destruction can be used as a material for main 2, but it's not enough to follow up to that point.

Good

サンパイ
2020/02/21 20:58

Hey, why is he destroying LIGHT? I feel like the rule effect that only one body can exist on the field is unnecessary now.

Good

シエスタ
2019/09/05 9:13

The enhancement rate is too low~, and at this level, something like a maintenance cost is required for some reason.
Is he ATK? It's hard to get rid of it even if you pull it.
If you turn it into some kind of material after attacking, you can reduce the cost.
However, the feeling of exhaustion will become stronger, and the number of rivals will increase further.
It's an unstable bastard, and I think it's a performance that can withstand practical use.

Good

ソレイユ
2018/02/26 22:55

If there are no demerits, it's one chance at Lairo... isn't it? It's a pity that the rise value is as low as 100

Good

備長炭18
2018/02/25 0:20

What a difficult card to use... (Despair)
His own ATK is practically 0. Moreover, because the notation is "?", it is slightly supportive but loses.
On top of that, he asks for his LIGHT in his field as a maintenance cost, not to mention the fact that the increase value is only 100.
With this, if the increase value was 200, I would have been motivated to build a specialized deck or create a story deck to mow the lawn.

Good ( 1 )

京太
2017/12/06 17:18

Normal cards that are very easy to obtain
Urrea is also readily available and wallet-friendly for duelists

Good

ミシガン州知事
2016/03/01 15:50

Demerit Card Kitakore←
Aside from that, his ATK rise of "the number of GY's LIGHT monsters x 100"...
I'd like to say that Lightsworn, whose main deck is mainly his LIGHT monster and specializes in his GY fertilizer, is a good match.
The ultimate disadvantage, during your end phase
I will tell you about Mikata's Hikari Zokusei
I don't (
If you're asking for maintenance costs that high, you should increase his ATK rise rate per LIGHT monster in GY.

Good

あだ
2016/03/01 13:09

The normal extra pack is full of trash cards, but this guy stands out from the crowd
Nuvia, 《Larvae Moth》, 《Dark Artist》along with Kuz Card Four Heavenly Kings

Good

ヒコモン
2016/03/01 12:43

It would be nice to increase RBI by the number of GY's LIGHT, but the increase is only 100. Moreover, his own ATK is practically 0. In spite of that degree of effect, for some reason it requires a maintenance cost, and there are mysterious restrictions such as only one being able to appear on the field. I entered with Ulrea in the Lightsworn set, but it's a complete win. There would have been more cards that should have been Ulrea.

Good

アルバ
2015/06/15 0:12

A card that is quite weak and has a great disadvantage in exchange for a weak advantage.
For some reason he was reprinted in the Lightsworn set and came back as an ultra-rare to kill the slot.

Good

hio
2014/08/27 21:07

At first glance, it seems to be compatible with Lilo, but its increase value is only 100...
On top of that, I don't know what to do with maintenance costs...

Good

SOUL
2013/03/09 16:01

Does that mean you should throw it away?
If that's the case, I would have liked to have raised the price.
Also, was there any point in making him useless ATK "?"...

Good

スクラップトリトドン
2010/12/03 16:53

It's too disrespectful to demand maintenance costs even though the increase is miserable.
If the increase value was about x500, I was still convinced...

Good

とき
2010/08/10 22:34

A monster that has the effect of strengthening his LIGHT on the field according to the number of his LIGHTs in his GY, and the effect of having to destroy his own LIGHT monsters during each end phase.
Since he himself can only obtain his ATK as corrected by his own effect, he is too poor and the maintenance cost is too heavy. Using 《Luminous Spark 》will be more stable.
It's true that he understands what he wants to tell GY about her LIGHT monsters accumulating easily, but Lilo why is he in the Deck...
Let me at least pretend that there was no maintenance cost...

Good

2014/08/27 20:54