HOME　＞　 Card Rating List 　＞　備長炭18's Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List

Yu-Gi-Oh! Card Rating List　Showing 2,956 to 2,970 of 4,129

Check out the latest Yu-Gi-Oh! card ratings! You can filter the rating comments by keywords.

	Rating Score・ Review Posting Date
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Equeste》 8 備長炭18 2018/04/08 21:48 Gladiator Beast Salvage Officer If you're targeting monsters, Resurrection Darius is better than recovering, but the target you're recovering is likely Gladiator Beast War Chariot. The mere presence of his powerful Counter Trap will hinder your opponent's movement, so if you're going to use this, I'd like to use it as much as possible. The downside is that it really doesn't have much of a role, so depending on the construction and situation, it's likely to be just vanilla. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Test Ape》 2 備長炭18 2018/04/08 21:40 I could have given him a slightly better score if he had recruited me as a result of Gladiator Beast. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Retiari》 8 備長炭18 2018/04/08 21:38 GY ad crushing Gladiator Beast Because of its low stats, ping is enough for basics, but with Special Summon, you can remove the opponent's GY card, so it works nasty at just the right time. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Essedarii》 5 備長炭18 2018/04/08 21:33 He has 500 RBI more than Dragasis, but he can no longer summon Gladiator Beasts from his Deck. (First appearance here) For the time being, he has the advantage of being able to return him to the deck with any combination of Gladiator Beasts, but since he's devised from the construction stage, it's difficult to adopt unless there's a big problem. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Trojan Gladiator Beast》 1 備長炭18 2018/04/08 21:28 In order to activate the effect of his Gladiator Beast sent to the opponent, it is necessary not to destroy it through battle, so I personally do not want to create such a troublesome situation for a 1-draw Trap card. If I could have sent it from Deck, I would have been able to evaluate it a little more... Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Tygerius》 4 備長炭18 2018/04/08 21:23 Can't be used for fusion (well, forgive me) You can't switch, which is a common effect of Gladiator Beast (your status is low, right?) Search with hand cost (Although there is Samnite, I can appreciate the fact that there is no need to destroy it in battle, and I can appreciate that his spells and traps can be used for the cost. It's a waste.) Conclusion: Very impression of choosing his deck. If you use Noxius as one of the flows like the one below, it's fine, but unless you rely on it, it's difficult to adopt. If only I could search for spells and traps... Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Murmillo》 7 備長炭18 2018/04/08 21:05 Gladiator Beast that can destroy monsters Due to the adjustment by the effect, it is difficult to participate in the battle because the status is low, so it is necessary to pay attention to the number of recruits and the timing of summoning. Personally, I think Gladiator Beast is at an overwhelming disadvantage to other Coliseums that Fish can participate in, but what about that? Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Darius》 10 備長炭18 2018/04/08 20:59 In charge of reviving the Gladiator Beast. With Noxius and Dragasis, which goes to his GY, the chances of activation are greatly improved. Since the disadvantage is a little severe, let's quickly turn both of them into materials after catching them. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Hoplomus》 3 備長炭18 2018/04/08 20:54 Rather than fighting by myself, I had an image that I would mainly lie down and switch to the opponent's turn with reflected damage. It's pretty easy to break through the 2100 barrier these days, so I think it's a little tough to use this card on the assumption that it's a card like Reconciliation. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Laquari》 5 備長炭18 2018/04/08 20:48 It's possible to use Heraclinos type, which is mainly for low class, but now it's pretty difficult to adopt if it's 1800 and Gladiator Beast effect is 2100 RBI. Since I am a low-level Beast-Warrior, I would like to take advantage of the fact that I can receive such support. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Parry》 2 備長炭18 2018/04/08 20:44 Using this just for the trap card is a little... It would be a shame to have Gladiator Beast to bring it back into the Deck. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Torax》 1 備長炭18 2018/04/08 20:41 Any theme has monsters with common effects that have been mistakenly inherited, and it's still alive and well in Gladiator Beast. The unique effect is practically non-existent, and what can be obtained by fighting with unsatisfactory status in battle is nothing more than a single draw. There are many duelists who think, "Rather than that, he should call the Gladiator Beast." And the biggest problem is that the new Sagittarius outperformed this card in terms of add and speed. For the time being, Fish is relatively minor in Gladiator Beast, so he can be differentiated in terms of support such as recurrence, but the difference in single performance can be said to be at a level that can't be helped. Chorus. Good ( 1 )
▶︎ Deck	《Test Tiger》 9 備長炭18 2018/04/08 20:38 On the board, it will simply lose one add, but it will recruit you as the effect of Gladiator Beast, so it is a very good tiger that will help you deploy without going through battle. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Heraklinos》 9 備長炭18 2018/04/08 20:32 Gladiator Beast Ace The material is heavy with 3 bodies, but it became quite easy to put out by Edittle, which can be said to be a little cheating method. Of course, it's not that difficult to use Raquel and use normal means, so it's possible to use it without forcibly adopting an advanced deck in the main deck. The RBI is also perfect, and the suppression effect that negates the activation as long as the hand lasts is also very good. Good
▶︎ Deck	《Gladiator Beast Augustus》 8 備長炭18 2018/04/08 18:58 Currently, I have multiple copies of Gladiator Beasts of level 5 or higher as materials for Andabatae and Edittor, but if I don't coordinate the number of other Gladiator Beasts I use, sometimes I don't have enough people to deploy from my hand. When a card comes into your hand, it can only be processed by calling another deck, so I don't think it's necessary to forcefully adopt it in a lower deck that can spin enough. It will be mainly adopted in his Deck, which was added as one element to the end. Good